Random Post

Thursday, June 18, 2020
no image

The government has been forced to abandon a centralised coronavirus contact-tracing app after spending three months and millions of pounds on technology that experts had repeatedly warned would not work.

In an embarrassing U-turn, Matt Hancock said the NHS would switch to an alternative designed by the US tech companies Apple and Google, which is months away from being ready. At the Downing Street briefing, the health secretary said the government would not "put a date" on when the new app may be launched, although officials conceded it was likely to be in the autumn or winter. The idea behind the NHS app was that it could trace anybody that a person with coronavirus symptoms came into close contact with by using the Bluetooth connectivity on a standard smartphone, and notify them to self-isolate. Ministers had insisted on using a centralised version of the untested technology in which anonymised data from people who reported feeling ill was held in an NHS database to enable better tracing and data analysis. This version was not supported by Apple and Google. Facebook Twitter Pinterest Work started in March as the pandemic unfolded, but despite weeks of work, officials admitted on Thursday that the NHS app only recognised 4% of Apple phones and 75% of Google Android devices during testing on the Isle of Wight. That was because the design of Apple's iPhone operating system is such that apps quickly go to sleep when they are not being used and cannot be activated by Bluetooth – a point raised by experts and reported by the Guardian in early May. The Department of Health and Social Care refused to say how much had been spent on the effort, although official records show three contracts worth £4.8m were awarded to the developer VMWare Pivotal Labs for work on the app. Silkie Carlo, the director of the privacy charity Big Brother Watch, said: "This just shows what a mess the centralised data-hungry approach was. Government was wrong to waste precious time and millions of pounds of public money on a design that everyone warned was going to fail, and now we're back at square one." Hancock had been particularly enthusiastic about the NHS app and had at one point said it would be "rolling out in mid-May" across England. Officials had denied the Apple-Google alternative was being evaluated, although on Thursday it was revealed that in fact work was going on to assess it from 6 May. On Thursday, Hancock said the alternative was not ready either because it could not measure distance accurately. In some cases it cannot distinguish between phones 1 metre and 3 metres away – even though one is inside and one outside the current 2-metre physical distancing limit. Experts say an app would be useful to track the potential spread from an infected person on public transport or in any other situation where they come into contact with people they do not know. But the distance measurement problem means it cannot be relied on to make decisions about who should self-isolate. In the press briefing, Hancock tried to shift the blame on to Apple, saying: "So as it stands, our app won't work because Apple won't change their system, but it [the NHS app] can measure distance and their app can't measure distance well enough to a standard that we are satisfied with." When asked whether he had unwisely stuck to the wrong approach, Hancock said: "I'm from Newmarket, we back both horses." He went on to argue that testing the Apple–Google alternative for several weeks meant the government could make the leap from one system to another with confidence. Q&A What is contact tracing? Show Hide Contact tracing is one of the most basic planks of public health responses to a pandemic like the coronavirus. It means literally tracking down anyone that somebody with an infection may have had contact with in the days before they became ill. It was – and always will be – central to the fight against Ebola, for instance. In west Africa in 2014-15, there were large teams of people who would trace relatives and knock on the doors of neighbours and friends to find anyone who might have become infected by touching the sick person. Most people who get Covid-19 will be infected by their friends, neighbours, family or work colleagues, so they will be first on the list. It is not likely anyone will get infected by someone they do not know, passing on the street. It is still assumed there has to be reasonable exposure – originally experts said people would need to be together for 15 minutes, less than 2 metres apart. So a contact tracer will want to know who the person testing positive met and talked to over the two or three days before they developed symptoms and went into isolation. South Korea has large teams of contact tracers and notably chased down all the contacts of a religious group, many of whose members fell ill. That outbreak was efficiently stamped out by contact tracing and quarantine. Singapore and Hong Kong have also espoused testing and contact tracing and so has Germany. All those countries have had relatively low death rates so far. The World Health Organization says it should be the "backbone of the response" in every country. Sarah Boseley Health editor Was this helpful? Thank you for your feedback. Apple did not immediately comment but in a statement on Thursday night, Google said: "We welcome the announcement from the UK government today. We have developed an Exposure Notification API with Apple based on consultation with public health experts around the world, including in the UK, to ensure that our efforts are useful to authorities as they build their own apps to limit the spread of Covid-19, while ensuring privacy and security are central to the design." Earlier this week Italy and Germany launched their own apps nationwide based on the Google-Apple model. The Italian app has been downloaded 2.7m times, while the German app was taken up 6.5m times on Tuesday, its first day. Speculation about the fate of the NHS app had been circulating for weeks after Hancock's mid-May deadline was missed. On Wednesday, James Bethell, a junior health minister responsible for the app, told MPs it would not be ready until the end of the year. "We're seeking to get something going for the winter, but it isn't a priority for us," he told a parliamentary committee. At one point it had been hoped that Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland would also use the app, which is intended for England in its revised form. But the repeated delays had prompted the other nations to reconsider. Jonathan Ashworth, the shadow health secretary, said: "This is unsurprising and yet another example of where the government's response has been slow and badly managed. It's meant precious time and money wasted. "For months, tech experts warned ministers about the flaws in their app, which is why we wrote to Matt Hancock encouraging the government to consider digital alternatives back in May." Sal Brinton, the Liberal Democrat health spokesperson in the Lords, said: "Lord Bethell and Dido Harding [who is in charge of the test-and-trace programme] have already said it will be some months before England has that full service, probably winter. We need it now, and changing to an app that still has technical issues with Bluetooth distracts from the importance of fast, effective tracing by experts." Topics Coronavirus outbreak Infectious diseases Apple Google Mobile phones Bluetooth Apps news Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via Email Share on LinkedIn Share on Pinterest Share on WhatsApp Share on Messenger Reuse this content

7:31 PM

The government has been forced to abandon a centralised coronavirus contact-tracing app after spending three months and millions of pound...

Read more »
no image

Police are extracting "excessive amounts of personal data" from the mobile phones of victims and witnesses during investigations and are in danger of discouraging the public from reporting crime, the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has warned.

In a critical study of data extraction policies, the ICO concludes that procedures are inconsistent across forces in England and Wales and calls for a new statutory code of practice to provide "greater clarity".The report follows criticism of the criminal justice system over the fall in rape convictions and the introduction of a new police digital consent form.The information commissioner, Elizabeth Denham, said: "Current mobile phone extraction practices and rules risk negatively affecting public confidence in our criminal justice system."Police data extraction practices vary across the country, with excessive amounts of personal data often being extracted, stored, and made available to others, without an appropriate basis in existing data protection law."People expect to understand how their personal data is being used, regardless of the legal basis for processing. My concern is that an approach that does not seek this engagement risks dissuading citizens from reporting crime, and victims may be deterred from assisting police."The report notes that individuals see mobile phones "as extensions of themselves; they have become unique repositories of our personal information, generating huge amounts of data and often hold the most intimate and private details of our everyday lives".Police data extraction methods "appeared excessive in many cases, with little or no justification or demonstration of strict necessity and proportionality", it adds. Claire Waxman, London's victims commissioner who raised concerns with the ICO, said: "Major changes are needed in how the criminal justice system gathers and uses the personal data of victims and how this is being communicated to victims … Current practices around how police collect mobile phone data, how much data they request and how it is shared with others, are damaging public confidence in our criminal justice system, and can deter victims from pursuing the justice they deserve."We still need to understand how these requests from the police and the CPS for excessive personal data are fuelling high levels of victims withdrawing from cases," she said."Whilst I welcome the work … the recommendations have not gone far enough to provide the clarity the police urgently need to ensure a consistent approach that not only complies with data protection laws but is needed for victims to feel confident when reporting a crime that their data will not be used to discredit them and will be handled securely and with respect throughout the criminal justice process."But Claire Howell, a barrister at Drystone chambers, London, tweeted in response to the report: "I have had several cases where the complainant refused to hand over their telephones and were compelled to do so by the judge. In all those cases the material on the phones resulted in the case being dropped, because my client was innocent."Dame Vera Baird QC, the victims' commissioner for England and Wales, said: "In the 15 months since the notices were introduced, charities have reported hundreds of rape complainants who have been forced to hand over personal data in fear of otherwise being denied justice. Hundreds more will have shrunk from the intrusion demanded into their privacy, and that of their families, and as a result there have been instances where otherwise 'strong' cases have been dropped."Kate Ellis, a solicitor at the Centre for Women's Justice, said: "We are constantly being referred cases where victims of serious sexual offending are extremely distressed that they have been asked to agree to a full or very extensive download from their mobile phones, whether or not it's proportionate to the facts of the case. Victims are frequently being told that they have no choice, or the suspect will not be prosecuted."

7:31 PM

Police are extracting "excessive amounts of personal data" from the mobile phones of victims and witnesses during investigations ...

Read more »
no image

The US government wants a high-capacity undersea data cable system proposed by Google and Facebook to bypass Hong Kong, citing potential national security concerns following China's moves to exert greater control in the territory.

The Pacific Light Cable Network, pending approval by the federal communications commission (FCC), should connect the US, Taiwan and the Philippines but not go through Hong Kong as planned, a US Justice Department committee has recommended.The high-capacity, low-latency fibre optic cable backed by Google and Facebook would "encourage" US communications crossing the Pacific Ocean to land in Hong Kong before continuing on to other parts of Asia, the DoJ reasoned.The recommendation to the FCC contended that the cable network's "proposed Hong Kong landing station would expose US communications traffic to collection" by Beijing.The concerns have been heightened by the Chinese government's "recent actions to remove Hong Kong's autonomy and allow for the possibility that [Beijing's] intelligence and security services will operate openly in Hong Kong", the DoJ said in a release.Google and Facebook four years ago announced plans to work with a China Soft Power Holdings subsidiary to connect Los Angeles and Hong Kong with a high-capacity internet cable.The Pacific Light Cable Network was to stretch 12,800km (8,000 miles), crossing beneath the Pacific Ocean in a first-of-its-kind direct connection between the two locations, according to companies involved with the project.The PLCN is expected to handle some 120 terabytes of data per second, enough for 80 million high-definition video conference calls at once between Los Angeles and Hong Kong.Lifestyles and work practices increasingly centred on access to cloud-based online services, as well as to video, pictures and other content on the internet, have increased the need for quick and efficient digital data infrastructure.The FCC in April granted Google's request for temporary authority to operate the segment of the cable network connecting the US and Taiwan.

7:31 PM

The US government wants a high-capacity undersea data cable system proposed by Google and Facebook to bypass Hong Kong, citing potential na...

Read more »
no image

The other day I was in a Zoom meeting with colleagues I don't know that well.

The tone was serious and formal when suddenly everything changed. The door behind the man chairing the meeting burst open and his toddler ran in, jumped on his lap and smeared Vegemite all over his computer screen.It reminded me of the video that went viral in 2017. Prof Robert Kelly was being interviewed live by the BBC when his small daughter strutted into the room behind him. His toddler spotted the open door and followed his sister in with great delight. The clip ends with a frantic mother removing the kids.We may not be seeing each other at work these days but in some ways we're seeing a lot more of each other than we anticipated. That revelation is making me think that screens might be perversely better at connecting us than face-to-face workplace life.A postgraduate researcher, Rebecca Lellie, told me a wonderful story about why she decided to write her thesis on screen cultures. She was babysitting a seven-year-old girl whose 10- and 12-year-old brothers always hogged the TV. One night they disappeared upstairs and Rebecca told the little girl she had the big screen all to herself. The girl looked at her, picked up her iPad and said: "No thanks. I like it closer."Televisions are usually housed in a public part of the house. People come and go and observe what we are watching. Tablets and laptops allow us to wander into a private space and watch unobserved. As Rebecca observed in her research, they encourage a more intimate mode of viewing.I've been thinking about that seven-year-old girl in the endless Zoom meetings we've all been in. What does her comment tell us about our relationship to screens? What is the difference between being face-to-face and meeting in a virtual environment?One of the things virtual meetings do is put us all in each other's homes. We try to look professional from the waist up. But when that two-year-old bursts in the boundaries between the workplace and the domestic space collapse.It's a feminist shibboleth that women have historically borne the burden of being the keepers of the domestic domain. That we are the ones who have done most of the cleaning up, the cooking and the emotional labour. Just ask any woman who's gone to work with Weet-bix in her hair.These days, of course, many men do more of their share too. But until now a lot of the invisible labour that we all do at home was absent from the workplace.There has been a lot of lip service paid to flexible work practices. But the reality is that a lot of us are still obliged to do the commute and turn up to the office.Covid-19 has plunged us all into a gigantic experiment in working from home. We are physically disconnected but, perversely, we are more connected to our colleagues' lives. On the screen we are all seeing each other in close-up. We are framed by the stuff of our personal lives.Could the pandemic have an upside? Will we be better at balancing work and life?Feminist demands for flexible working hours and practices that are not built around the needs of the traditional male breadwinner have made little inroads in mainstream corporate culture. If anything, the online and mobile era has resulted in us being more tethered to work than ever before.What if it took a virus to reboot our workplace cultures and humanise them? To give our leaders and managers confidence that people can be trusted to deliver without having to put on suits and judged on what time they leave the office.Maybe it's time to reflect on what we have learned from the vast working-at-home experiment thrust upon us.We hear a lot about how screens disconnect us and separate us from "reality'" Yet I suspect many of us have found just the opposite by looking into each other's lounge rooms and bedrooms. Seeing children wandering in and out of the frame.I was in a virtual meeting the other day when a man who is famous for his relentlessly pragmatic demeanour paused and asked everyone to explain what was behind them. We talked about our paintings and photos and books and what they meant to us.That, I thought, right there is the glimmer of the breakthrough that women have been hoping for. A crack in the ceiling of corporate culture. Catharine Lumby is a professor of media studies at Macquarie University and the director of the Centre for Media History

7:31 PM

The other day I was in a Zoom meeting with colleagues I don't know that well. The tone was serious and formal when suddenly everything...

Read more »
no image

The government has abandoned its efforts to build a centralised coronavirus contact-tracing app after nearly three months, announcing it will instead switch to the model preferred by the technology firms Apple and Google.

The move is another embarrassing U-turn for the government in its management of the pandemic, but what is it all about?What is a contact-tracing app?Contact tracing is a crucial part of a "suppression" strategy for managing Covid-19, in which the health service tries to keep new cases as low as possible for as long as possible. By tracking down everyone a newly infected person has been near and advising them to self-isolate before they too potentially become infectious, the chain of transmission can be broken, preventing further infections.A contact-tracing app attempts to automate some of that work by using the technology in smartphones to automatically record who you have been close to. The advantages, if it works, are clear: the app can track contacts who you may not know personally, eg, those you came close to on public transport, in bars and restaurants, or in shops; and it can speed up the work of notifying tens or hundreds of people at once that they may have been exposed to Covid-19.How does it work?All major approaches to contact tracing have used the Bluetooth wireless radio to try to track nearby phones. By constantly sending out a unique, anonymous signal, and listening to other signals being sent out, a phone can build a sort of address book of all the other people it has been near. Then, if its owner comes down with Covid-19, the app can send a warning to every phone it recently heard from.But there is one major split in approaches, about whether that warning should also be sent to the health services of the country. Under the approach the UK government had been trialling until Thursday, the NHS would have acted as a centralised body, receiving the warnings and passing them on to all other phones. That would have given the government much more visibility on the spread of the disease, and allowed it to implement tighter security to prevent malicious use of the system. However, the potential overreach of this approach concerned privacy campaigners.What went wrong with the government app?Always sending messages over Bluetooth chews up phone batteries, and can, if done maliciously, prove a major security hazard, so both Android and iOS, the two main operating systems, limit what apps can do with it. That means that, in the first version of the government's app, contacts were only successfully recorded 75% of the time for Android phones, and just 4% of the time for iPhones, which have a much stricter set of restrictions.How did Apple and Google get involved?Apple and Google worked together to build a new set of tools that governments around the world could use to avoid those restrictions, which they announced in April and released a month later in May. But apps built using those tools have to operate in a "decentralised" way, giving up access to the data which the NHS hoped to use, leading to two months of standoff.Are the problems all fixed now?One major issue remains, which has plagued not only the UK's tests, but other contact-tracing apps around the globe: the Bluetooth signal on which the app depends is a very unreliable way of estimating distance. This means that two phones kept in pockets on a crowded train can "think" they are very far away from each other despite being within 2 metres, while two phones in active use outdoors can "think" they are very close, even if they are in fact well out of the danger zone.Unless that problem is solved, contract-tracing apps will give far too many false results, either advising people to isolate who are at no risk of spreading coronavirus, or allowing people to think they are virus-free when they may in fact be spreading it.

7:31 PM

The government has abandoned its efforts to build a centralised coronavirus contact-tracing app after nearly three months, announcing it wi...

Read more »
no image

Designed to be a key component of the test, track and trace programme to forge a way out of lockdown, the NHS Covid-19 app has been beset by problems from day one – despite repeated claims to the contrary.

After a trial on the Isle of Wight at the start of May, the contact-tracing app was meant to be rolled out to the rest of England by the middle of the month. That soon slipped to some time in June. Then on Wednesday it emerged that we would have to wait until the winter. Now – after much behind-the-scenes scrambling, and head-scratching in Westminster – officials have decided to ditch the app entirely in its current form. How did this calamitous state of events unravel so spectacularly? Inspired by Singapore's perceived early success in releasing TraceTogether, the first government-backed contact-tracing app, NHSX – a digital unit run jointly with the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) – set about developing its own version at the end of March. The following month, Apple and Google announced an unprecedented collaboration to leverage smartphone technology to help trace and contain the spread of coronavirus. But divisions between the UK's approach and that of the two tech giants – denied at the time by NHSX – began to show later that month. A group of nearly 300 experts condemned the UK's plans, citing privacy concerns over the centralised model. In the same week, France – one of the only other countries to pursue a centralised app model – publicly attacked Apple and Google for not loosening privacy protections. In early May, with a trial already under way on the Isle of Wight – where questions were raised about glitches on some phones and the potential lack of take-up among the island's older population – it emerged that the government had left open the prospect of ditching the app in its current form. It was revealed that a feasibility study into moving to a "decentralised" model was under way. By mid-May, with the promised nationwide rollout nowhere to be seen, the Guardian reported that the app's advisory board was split over whether it had the authority to tell the government to ditch its version and switch to a decentralised model. Members told of concerns that a lack of transparency and a rush to deploy the technology without proper testing risked compromising the project. As the days passed, ministers were accused of "misstep after misstep" when the Guardian revealed that applicants to become contact tracers were told recruitment was on hold while the government considered an alternative app. At the time, a DHCS spokesperson said: "The NHS contact-tracing app is not on hold and it would be completely wrong to suggest otherwise. There is no alternative app and the NHS continues to work constructively with many other organisations that are helping to develop and test the NHS Covid-19 app." That statement has not aged well. Eventually, as cracks continued to emerge with the app, the "track" element of the government's three-pronged approach was quietly dropped. Instead, the health secretary, Matt Hancock, unveiled the "test and trace" plan in England at the end of May. Now, in an embarrassing U-turn, it has been confirmed that it will switch to the model preferred by Apple and Google. At the crux of the matter has remained a key question: why did the UK government, unlike many others, continue to pursue a centralised model in the first place? The NHS app works by using Bluetooth technology on smartphones to register when people come into close contact with each other. Relying on users to flag up when they develop symptoms, it then uses a centralised database to alert others with whom they have come into contact that they are at risk of infection so they should isolate and get tested. Under the "centralised" model, information about who people came into contact with would be shared in an anonymised form with the health service, enabling tracking of both the data and the spread of Covid-19 but prompting privacy concerns. In the "decentralised" model, favoured by Apple and Google, no data is held in a single official database. Germany, Italy and Denmark are among other nations to have switched to a decentralised approach. Northern Ireland has already announced its intentions to develop a separate app to ensure compatibility with the one being developed by the Republic of Ireland, in order to aid cross-border travel. On Thursday, startling details emerged about the NHS app which help explain why it has finally been dropped in its current form. The app only recognised 4% of Apple phones and 75% of Android models. The alternative Google/Apple model can identify 99% of phones, but has problems distinguishing between whether somebody was 1 metre or 3 metres away. Given the problems, officials hope to find a "third way" by working with the two firms to create a tracing app that would work accurately. Officials refused to say how much money has been spent on developing the failed app, but an official database records three contracts worth £4.8m awarded to the company asked to develop the app, Pivotal VMWare. Without the help of the app's technology, the government has relied on human contact tracers to get in touch with those falling ill and trace the peop0le they have come into contact with. The app has been recast as "the cherry on the cake" and deemed "not a priority". However, early signs show that the human-only contact-tracing method is not working as smoothly as the government might hope – with figures showing approximately a quarter of people are not being reached. With no new launch date officially confirmed, many may be questioning whether precious time has been squandered. People will also be wondering how much longer they will have to wait until the app, which could prove crucial in tackling a potential second wave of coronavirus, is finally out. Topics Coronavirus outbreak NHS Matt Hancock Apple Google Bluetooth Apps analysis Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via Email Share on LinkedIn Share on Pinterest Share on WhatsApp Share on Messenger Reuse this content

7:31 PM

Designed to be a key component of the test, track and trace programme to forge a way out of lockdown, the NHS Covid-19 app has been beset...

Read more »
no image

Protests over police violence and racism have amplified calls to re-examine police budgets in the United States, with several large companies announcing they are re-evaluating their commercial ties with police departments.

But a new report sheds light on the myriad other ways corporations engage with police forces, including by donating to police foundations that don't face the same scrutiny as police departments.The report was released on Thursday by the Public Accountability Initiative, a nonprofit corporate and government accountability research institute, and its research database project LittleSis. It details how more than 25 large corporations in the past three years have contributed funding to private police foundations – industry groups designated as nonprofits that provide additional funds to police forces.Police proponents say the foundations have emerged as police departments face budget cuts and are a means to supplement the force with top-of-the-line technology and weaponry. But critics argue police departments are already overfunded – they receive 20% to 45% of discretionary funds in cities across the US – and that funding through foundations allows police to operate with little oversight. Foundations, according to a 2014 report from ProPublica, "can be a way for wealthy donors and corporations to influence law enforcement agencies' priorities".Legally, police budgets are typically public documents that must be approved by elected officials. But designated as private charities, police foundations are not subject to the same public information laws that apply to law enforcement agencies.These foundations receive millions of dollars a year from private and corporate donors, according to the report, and are able to use the funds to purchase equipment and weapons with little public input. The analysis notes, for example, how the Los Angeles police department in 2007 used foundation funding to purchase surveillance software from controversial technology firm Palantir. Buying the technology with private foundation funding rather than its public budget allowed the department to bypass requirements to hold public meetings and gain approval from the city council. Police move through the streets during demonstrations over the death of George Floyd on 1 June 2020 in Los Angeles, California. Photograph: David McNew/Getty ImagesThe Houston police foundation has purchased for the local police department a variety of equipment, including Swat equipment, sound equipment and dogs for the K-9 unit, according to the report. The Philadelphia police foundation purchased for its police force long guns, drones and ballistic helmets, and the Atlanta police foundation helped fund a major surveillance network of over 12,000 cameras.In addition to weaponry, foundation funding can also go toward specialized training and support programs that complement the department's policing strategies, according to one police foundation."Not a lot of people are aware of this public-private partnership where corporations and wealthy donors are able to siphon money into police forces with little to no oversight," said Gin Armstrong, a senior research analyst at LittleSis.A variety of companies – including financial institutions, technology companies, retailers, local universities and sports teams, provide funding to police foundations. Donations may be, in part, to curry favor with a force that exists primarily to protect property and capital, the report said."Police foundations are a key space for orchestrating, normalizing and celebrating the collaboration between corporate power and the police," the LittleSis report said.Among the companies with ties to police is Amazon. The online giant last week implemented a one-year moratorium on the use of its artificial intelligence software Rekognition by police departments after extended criticism from human rights groups.But the company still has a number of less-direct connections to the police, according to the LittleSis report. A representative of the company currently sits on the executive committee of the Seattle police foundation's board and Amazon has been an official partner to the police foundation, donating at least $5,000 according to the foundation website.It also donates to police foundations across the US through its charitable program, AmazonSmile and still partners with more than 1,000 police forces through its smart doorbell product Ring.Amazon declined to comment on its continued ties with police and police foundations.Bank of America has seats on both the Chicago and New York City police foundation boards. According to tax filings examined by LittleSis, it has given hundreds of thousands of dollars to police foundations, including $200,000 to the NYC police foundation, $51,250 to the Atlanta police foundation, $25,000 to the Boston police foundation, $10,000 to the Los Angeles police foundation, as well as smaller donations to police foundations in Yarmouth, Massachusetts; Sarasota, Florida; Abilene, Texas; Duluth, Minnesota; Bellevue, Washington; and Sacramento and Glendale, California.Bank of America announced on 2 June a four-year commitment to support economic opportunity initiatives to combat racial inequality accelerated by the global pandemic.Seattle-based Starbucks is an active donor to the Seattle police foundation and has a representative on its board, according to the report. The coffee retailer also recently donated $25,000 to the NYC police foundation.Bank of America and Starbucks did not respond to requests for comment. Critics argue police departments are already overfunded – they receive 20% to 45% of discretionary funds in cities across the US. Photograph: Kenneth Martin/ZUMA Wire/REX/ShutterstockTarget has made major contributions to police foundations across the country, according to the report, including the NYC, Atlanta and Seattle police foundations. A $200,000 donation from Target in 2007 helped the LA police foundation purchase sophisticated surveillance equipment for the LAPD, the report found.Currently, Target is a sponsor of the Washington DC police foundation and has a representative on the board, the report notes. In addition to funding police foundations, Target offers additional funding to local agencies through its "public safety grant" program.A spokesman for Target said the donation to police foundations is a "very small portion of the 5% of annual profits Target gives back to the community".Facebook, Google and Microsoft are also all partners and donors to the Seattle police foundation, and Microsoft sits on the foundation's board, the report found. Microsoft and Facebook declined to comment on their donations to police foundations. Google did not respond to request for comment.Microsoft has publicly stated it will ban police from using its facial recognition technology.Evan Greer, the deputy director of digital rights group Fight for the Future, said the report highlights companies can't claim to stand for human rights while funding government agencies accused of violating them. "Corporations who cozy up to police, build surveillance software to them, or funnel them money through shady donations are actively propping up systemic racist violence and oppression."

7:31 PM

Protests over police violence and racism have amplified calls to re-examine police budgets in the United States, with several large compani...

Read more »
Monday, June 15, 2020
no image

As a female computer scientist, Alexia Athanasopoulou is used to being in the minority.

"People have asked me: 'you're a girl, why are you doing this?'". But it was when she moved to the Netherlands to start her PhD that she noticed a big difference. "The ratio of men to women in my engineering department was very high, and this had consequences for the working culture," she says.That women are underrepresented in science, technology, engineering and maths (Stem) is a well-known problem. The statistics for gender balance in higher education are similarly bleak: the European Commission estimates that women make up 48% of graduates but hold only 24% of senior academic roles, falling to 15% in Stem. Dutch universities are particularly gender imbalanced, and last year Eindhoven University of Technology (TUE) sat at the bottom of the pile with women representing just 15% of professors.The university is hoping a bold new approach to hiring practices may change that trajectory. It has made headlines by pledging only to hire women across all academic positions and at all levels until it reaches a target of 30% women professors in every department. New vacancies must be closed to men for the first six months, after which departments may open up the recruitment pool, provided they can demonstrate that no qualified women were available.  Alexia Athanasopoulou Photograph: TUETUE has also introduced a new Irène Curie fellowship, which is specifically targeted at filling senior Stem roles (though it is available across disciplines) and comes with a €100,000 (£90,000) research fund and social support network. Through this scheme, Athanasopoulou is now an assistant professor in information systems at TUE.The programme was heavily debated ahead of its launch, with roughly one third of staff against it, according to Robert-Jan Smits, president of TUE's board of governors. "But without this radical measure, we would have only arrived at a 50% gender balance by 2042 – we just did not want to wait that long." Smits believes that "disruptive measures only work when there is a strong commitment at the top, from leadership". So far, he's right: the proportion of female staff has leapt from 15 to 25% in the past year. The plan is for this to rise to 30% within five years.But the road to equality does not run smooth. Last month, TUE was taken to the the Netherlands Institute for Human Rights over claims their women-first initiative was discriminatory. A decision is expected in July, and if found in breach of fair recruitment laws, TUE's leaders will have to rethink their strategy. TUE is by no means the first university to opt for radical measures in addressing institutional inequality. In 2017, Essex University undertook what was believed to be a UK first in boosting the salaries of all its senior women, effectively eradicating the institution's gender pay gap where it was widest.  Essex has since reduced its mean average pay gap from 24.8% to 16.5%, but Lorna Fox O'Mahony, deputy vice-chancellor at the institution, says it has further to go. While the pay boost earned media coverage and warm words from other universities, no other institution has followed suit."This is a really tricky issue and there are long-term challenges with no single solution," she admits. "We took significant action to ensure men and women get equal pay for work of equal value, but there is a second dimension that comes down to cultural change."Cultural change is urgent: women and minority academics earn less than their white male equivalents and are more likely to be on part-time or precarious contracts. Meanwhile, the #MeToo campaign revealed the shocking prevalence of sexual harassment, violence and assault on campuses. Advance HE figures for 2017-18 suggest UK professors remain overwhelmingly white (91%), male (74.5%) and able-bodied (96.9%) – which is not reflective of an increasingly diverse student body."That teachers and lecturers should represent a diverse range of people is something students are increasingly aware of," says Sara Conejo Cervantes, chair of the feminist and gender equality society at Bath University. She says student campaigners are working with academic staff to promote fairer hiring processes, equal pay and diverse teaching content."It's definitely something students look for now in a university because everyone brings different things to the table. [Having staff] from different backgrounds ensures that different problems and stories are being shared." She cites her own example as illustrative: as a maths and computer sciences student, most of Conejo Cervantes's tutors and fellow coursemates are male, but she would prefer to go to a female teacher with a problem.There is a growing body of research to support the idea that teaching and learning are improved by a diversity of perspectives. Staff from historically marginalised backgrounds are more likely to integrate diversity issues into their curriculums, employ more inclusive approaches to learning and act as powerful role models.Some diversity experts are sceptical of "quick fix" initiatives like those trialled at Essex and Eindhoven. "I would much prefer to see the systemic problems in higher education being fixed, rather than cohorts being appointed as if by grace and favour. Who wants to be told, years later, that they only made the grade 'because they were a woman', not because of their innate brilliance?" asks Athene Donald, master of Churchill College, Cambridge. Michelle Chong Photograph: TUEWould TUE's latest hires have applied for an Irene Curie fellowship had the scheme not been targeted at women? "I would have applied regardless," says Michelle Chong, an assistant professor in Eindhoven's department of mechanical engineering and Irene Curie fellow. "In traditionally male-dominant disciplines, I believe that hiring faculty not solely because they are women, but because they are solid scientists in their own right, is beneficial in addressing the gender gap."Deniz Ikiz Kaya, an assistant professor in heritage and sustainability, agrees. "I had already met all the required and almost all of the suggested criteria listed in the job description. So I thought I was a very good match for the position, and considered the targeting of women candidates as a bonus point."The security of the scheme's tenure track position is also a draw. "One of the scheme's biggest benefits is that it provides a full starter package that supports women across all levels," Kaya adds. TUE promises flexible work schedules, a career opportunity programme to support accompanying partners, on-campus daycare for children and access to campus sports facilities.Kaya believes the fellowship could influence other universities. "TUE might contribute to setting high targets and standards for others. I think this policy has already acted as a catalyst for positive change."This article was amended on 15 June to correct the name of the court that will be hearing TUE's case from the European Court of Human Rights to the Netherlands Institute for Human Rights

7:10 PM

As a female computer scientist, Alexia Athanasopoulou is used to being in the minority. "People have asked me: 'you're a girl...

Read more »
no image

It's a scene out of every parent's – and teenager's – worst nightmare: two adult-film actors turn up naked at the front door, to tell a stunned mother: "Hiya … your son's been watching us online.

" The sudden appearance of a smiling but nude Sue and Derek has become something of a sensation as part on an unusual series of TV ads by the New Zealand government about internet safety for young people. In the latest video for the Keep It Real Online series, actors pretending to be porn stars tell a woman played by comedian Justine Smith that her son has been watching their clips "on his laptop, iPad, Playstation, his phone, your phone, Smart TV projector", adding that they don't talk about consent and "just get straight to it". New Zealand's first pornography report finds 'problematic' amount of coercion Read more "Yeah, and I'd never act like that in real life," the man, Derek, says, as the woman's horrified son enters the room holding his laptop. Sue explains: "We usually perform for adults but your son's just a kid. He might not know how relationships actually work." Facebook Twitter Pinterest 'Sue and Derek' let mother Sandra know about her son's viewing habits. Photograph: Keep I Real Online After walking in on the scene, her mortified son drops his bowl (while still keeping hold of his laptop), and his mother tells herself it's time to have a chat. It follows a December 2019 report that revealed young New Zealanders use the internet as their first and primary tool to learn about sex – and a third of the most popular pornography clips viewed in the country depicted non-consensual activities. Facebook Twitter Pinterest The series – which also include videos addressing cyberbullying, grooming by pedophiles, and the ease of children's access to violent content – encourage parents to "stay cool, calm and collected" when starting difficult conversations with their children about online issues, according to the creative agency responsible. "Parents should feel confident when dealing with these issues… at the end of the day, they're the best person to keep their child safe," Hilary Ngan Kee, a spokesperson for the advertising agency Motion Sickness, said in a statement. "You don't need to have all the answers, but supporting your child and giving that 'adult' guidance as they navigate the choppy waters of the online world will really make a difference." Facebook Twitter Pinterest It's not the first time New Zealand's government has commissioned advertising using humour to send a serious message: among the most popular are drink-driving advertisements in which a young man imagines a conversation with a "ghost" friend after a car accident. The public service announcement spawned the widely quoted meme, "You know I can't grab your ghost chips." Another saw the film director Taika Waititi satirically urging New Zealanders to support a new charitable cause: racism. "Kiwi humour sort of comes from late-night chats round a table, either in the kitchen, pub, or garage," said comedian James Nokise. "It's why we can come across to foreigners as either dry, too casual, or occasionally harsh … we're small enough that we've managed to take the kind of intimate family humour and apply it to the whole country." New Zealanders "love downplaying something to make it irreverent," he added. Topics New Zealand Asia Pacific Internet safety news Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via Email Share on LinkedIn Share on Pinterest Share on WhatsApp Share on Messenger Reuse this content

7:10 PM

It's a scene out of every parent's – and teenager's – worst nightmare: two adult-film actors turn up naked at the front door,...

Read more »
no image

'We are going to terrify you," declared the mayor of Middlesbrough, as he unveiled his grand plan for a trio of 20-storey towers earlier this year, billed as the tallest buildings between Leeds and Glasgow.

"This is about us saying we are here to be taken seriously now." Not many buildings are promoted as threats, but then not many mayors operate like millionaire businessman Andy Preston. Sick of decades of inaction in his home town, Preston has cooked up a £250m vision for a "stunning digital skyscraper" aimed at attracting tech companies, along with two residential towers, which he hopes will send chills down the spines of rival northern cities. "We are not going to put up with second best, put up with mediocre stuff," he said at the launch in February. "We are going to suck some of your business out of your cities to us." Facebook Twitter Pinterest 'No more second best' … the proposed residential towers, left, and the Boho X tech office block. A planning application was submitted and Chinese construction giant BCEGI has just been selected to develop the £30m "digital" office tower, christened Boho X. The glossy promotional visuals feature executives playing ping-pong on roof terraces and looking out over Teesside from their penthouse offices, happily at home in a place with its own private cinema, gym and even a rooftop helipad. Designed by local firm Logic Architecture, whose portfolio shows no evidence of tall buildings, the tower looks like something from a cut-price Gotham City. Its looming grey silhouette will be illuminated at night by glowing white stripes, the helipad floating overhead like an ominous halo. Preston's plans may have succeeded in unleashing terror, but perhaps not quite where he intended. Leeds and Newcastle might not be quaking, but those with a fondness for Middlesbrough certainly are. Boho X is a rushed, misjudged vanity project, say the building's critics, who fear it could lumber the town with a costly white elephant, a blot on the skyline for decades to come. "The only ambition this project has is to grab headlines," says architect James Perry, who grew up in Middlesbrough and runs Something Concrete and Modern, an archive documenting postwar architecture in north-east England. "It feels like a building from a different era – when to be aspirational, you needed to build tall. The town will have to live with the legacy of a development like this, and Middlesbrough deserves much better." Boho X and the two other towers are the latest attempt to re-energise a part of the town that has languished for decades, victim to various failed plans. The location, an area formerly known as St Hilda's, is a particularly loaded choice, as it was where Middlesbrough was founded in the 1830s, built as a planned settlement for the coal-shipping industry. This was set on a grid of terraced streets arranged around the old town hall, a handsome redbrick building that now stands as an abandoned relic, marooned in a wasteland of overgrown lots. The whole scene looks like something on the edge of Detroit. Facebook Twitter Pinterest Is that Marge Simpson's hair? … Will Alsop's colourful masterplan. Photograph: Courtesy of Alsop Architects The area was targeted for slum clearance after the second world war and replaced with social housing, but remained notorious for crime and sex work. It was bulldozed again in the 1980s, when it was reborn as Middlehaven and filled with two-storey homes. Separated from the rest of Middlesbrough by railway tracks, and nicknamed "over the border", the area continued to decline. Its buildings were demolished once again in the 2000s to make way for an elaborate masterplan by the late Will Alsop. As the Pied Piper of novelty plans for struggling northern towns, Alsop conjured up a kaleidoscopic vision of gigantic toy-shaped buildings scattered across a 100-hectare carpet, featuring a big teddy bear and an office block in the shape of Marge Simpson's hairdo. These would sit alongside a Rubik's cube cinema and a hotel modelled on the sticks-and-marbles game Ker-plunk. By 2012, with only one jaunty housing block completed, the vision was scrapped in favour of a more realistic plan for a mixed-used neighbourhood of streets and squares, reviving the Victorian layout of the area. Facebook Twitter Pinterest Sending a signal … Middlesbrough mayor Andy Preston. Common sense, it seemed, had finally prevailed, and the place set about feeling like part of the city again. A couple of fragments of terraced housing have since been built, along with the successful Boho Zone, a creative quarter for Middlesbrough's thriving digital media and technology companies, housed in a range of three to four-storey blocks linked by zig-zagging bridges. It has the beginnings of a successful place, but Mayor Preston wants to crank up the ambition, and he's not going to be constrained by the existing plans. "I've totally ignored the development frameworks and masterplans," he says proudly, speaking by phone from his home at Otterington Hall, a stately mansion with one of the finest topiary gardens in England. "When it comes to places like Middlesbrough, with decades of masterplans, they've all got one thing in common – they never happen." I've ignored the development frameworks and masterplans – what we have to do in Middlesbrough is get momentum going Andy Preston Rather than waste time and money on such elaborate big thinking, he wants to just forge ahead and build the towers regardless, hoping that building tall will send a signal and attract further investment. "If you try to make a plan perfect, it will literally never happen," he says. "It's a trade-off between making it happen and making it as perfect as possible. What we have to do in Middlesbrough is make stuff happen. We need to get that momentum going. Then we'll start planning, because we'll be fighting off the investors." A closer look at the blueprint for the office tower suggests he might want to do a bit more planning before the concrete-pouring begins. The building stands in splendid isolation with no relationship to its context, instead surrounded by three car parks, totalling 1.6 hectares of tarmac. Preston insists these will be temporary, but there's no sign of what might replace them. As for the proposed public space, it seems the architects have misplaced their scale ruler. The square at the heart of the development is as wide as the Champs-Élysées and, once you factor in the planned market area next to the town hall, the result will be a plaza as big as Trafalgar Square. The existing framework of walkable streets on a human scale has been swept aside for a 1960s vision of towers rising over a sea of undefined space, with parked cars as far as the eye can see. And is a glass tower really what tech startups want? "The biggest flaw is to do with who they're trying to attract," says Perry, who has written a detailed objection to the scheme, showing how the same amount of office space could be housed in a low-rise street-based development, with parking in a concealed podium. "Tech companies don't tend to be based in hermetic glass towers. They prefer low-rise campuses and have an environmentally conscious agenda. Where's the study to show this kind of space is desired, when there are offices across Middlesbrough standing empty?" Facebook Twitter Pinterest Vacant … the existing Centre North East office block in central Middlesbrough. Photograph: Peter Jordan_NE/Alamy Stock Photo A few hundred metres to the south stands Centre North East, the tallest building in Middlesbrough. Built in the 1970s and vacant for a decade, it's just one floor shorter than Preston's proposal, at 19 storeys. More recently, the council built a pair of office blocks nearby at Centre Square, both still awaiting tenants. "There are so many office blocks in Middlesbrough that could be redeveloped," says independent councillor Mick Saunders. "You can't fault Andy for wanting to bring investment in, but this looks like it could be a white elephant." Labour councillor Matt Storey is also sceptical. "Throwing up a tower block at this stage of Middlehaven's development just doesn't seem like the right thing to do," he says. "There was a plan in place to build up the neighbourhood incrementally, with streets of housing, a school, and an expansion of the Boho zone with a low-rise courtyard block designed specifically for tech firms." Preston dismisses the previous administration's plan, which included the same amount of office space, as "looking like something from a business park on the outskirts of Leeds". His detractors, however, believe it looked more appropriate for both the scale of the area and the very businesses he is looking to attract. As for demand, Preston claims a number of tenants have already put money down to be in his tower, including a local law firm, an e-commerce business and the architects themselves. In response to the suggestion of widespread vacancy, he is frank: "There's loads of vacancy," he says. "That's because it's all shit. Nobody has built a decent fucking office in Middlesbrough for decades." Facebook Twitter Pinterest An aerial view of the Boho X site, marked with proposed tower positions. Storey's concerns range from the details of the development to the way it appears to be being rushed through the system. He is ward councillor for the area in which the tower is proposed, yet the first he heard of the project was at its public launch on the day the planning application was submitted. He says there has been next to no public consultation, and he has also raised the question of conflicts of interest. Preston has declared a range of business interests in the area around the tower site, including the Boho 4 office development and a number of property companies, as well as investments in a range of tech firms of the kind the tower is aimed at. Storey makes no suggestion of corruption, but says these businesses and properties are bound to increase in value as a result of the proposed towers. "It's a stupid thing to say," says Preston. "I've got interests everywhere. Whatever I do, people claim I'm trying to do it for myself, but I've got much easier ways to make money." He maintains he is solely "on a mission to get jobs, ambition and optimism in the centre of town", and says he is in advanced talks with someone who wants to create a "wellbeing village" nearby, as well as an urban farm, and claims he now has a developer on board for the two residential towers. "I am most definitely not a saint," says the mayor, "but I'm not the fucking devil." Topics Architecture Middlesbrough Digital Britain Regeneration Communities Planning policy Infrastructure features Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via Email Share on LinkedIn Share on Pinterest Share on WhatsApp Share on Messenger Reuse this content

7:10 PM

'We are going to terrify you," declared the mayor of Middlesbrough, as he unveiled his grand plan for a trio of 20-storey towers...

Read more »
no image

When algorithms replace humans in charge of editing news, they tend to select more stories about celebrities from a less diverse selection of publications, according to research.

Jack Bandy and Nicholas Diakopoulos of Northwestern University in the US analysed Apple News over a two-month period from mid-March, collecting every headline published in two sections of the popular and influential news app: Top Stories, which contains content selected by a team of human editors employed by Apple; and Trending, which contains stories selected by the company's proprietary algorithm.Across more than 4,000 headlines, the algorithms selected far more stories, from a far more concentrated selection of publications, than the human editors. Nearly a third of all the "trending" stories came from just two outlets: CNN and Fox News. Adding in the next most favoured two, People magazine and BuzzFeed, accounted for half of the 3,144 headlines selected by algorithms.By contrast, the top 10 sources used by human editors – which did not include Fox News, Buzzfeed or People – accounted for just 56% of the headlines. "On the surface, this suggests that the algorithm could be choosing more stories about celebrities and other 'soft news'," wrote Bandy, which was backed up by an analysis of the topics: where the human editors were most likely to pick stories containing phrases such as "measles cases" or "Brexit deal", the algorithms preferred "Justin Bieber" and "Florida Man".The Duchess of Sussex and Donald Trump were rare topics of interest for both sets of editors.The findings underscore the problems with relying on automatic curators to do the work of human editors, even for services such as Apple News that try to use both in concert.Algorithmic editors can also fall prey to other issues, such as the "Scunthorpe problem" – a form of accidental censorship that sees stories blacklisted because of their similarity to obscenities, as with the four-letter word in the middle of the industrial town. In May, for instance, Twitter's algorithmic filters barred Dominic Cummings from automatically appearing in news roundups because of his surname's pornographic potential.However, the problems have not stopped publishers from embracing the cost savings automation can produce. Last month, Microsoft decided to replace all of the human editors who curate stories for the company's MSN News service with algorithms that could do the same work.Less than a week later, however, the robot editors had embroiled the company in a race row after illustrating a story about the Little Mix singer Jade Thirlwall with a picture of her bandmate Leigh-Anne Pinnock, the only other mixed-race member of the group. The algorithms then attempted to post a story about their own error, forcing the few remaining human editors to intervene.

7:10 PM

When algorithms replace humans in charge of editing news, they tend to select more stories about celebrities from a less diverse selection ...

Read more »
no image

The government must urgently ensure that more than 1 million children have reliable internet access at home or risk irreparable harm to their education, a cross-party group of MPs and former ministers has said.

Tony Blair is among a number of prominent figures, including a Tory grandee, to back calls to equip 1.3 million children eligible for free school meals with a broadband connection and devices.A bill that will be presented to parliament this week says the coronavirus lockdown had "exposed the digital divide", with about 700,000 children unable to complete any schoolwork because of a lack of internet at home.Siobhain McDonagh, the Labour MP behind the bill, said: "Those children who can't access the same resources as their classmates will find themselves even further behind when they finally return. Some may never catch up."This policy isn't a silver bullet and can't replace months of missed education. But it would make an immediate, tangible difference to families right across our country."The proposal has won the support of more than 40 leading voices on education including Sir Michael Wilshaw, the former head of Ofsted, Robert Halfon, the Conservative chair of the Commons education select committee, and Philip Harris, a multimillionaire Tory grandee and sponsor of 13 academies.Voluntary groups in some of Britain's most deprived areas have said that households without regular internet access were struggling to carry out essential tasks like pay bills, submit job applications and make universal credit inquiries since community centres and libraries closed in March.Among those hardest hit, the charities said, were about 700,000 children unable to complete schoolwork, and scores of elderly and disabled people who had been self-isolating – sometimes without any social contact – for more than three months.More than 5 million adults in the UK have either never used the internet or not used it in the past three months, equivalent to one in 10 of all adults in the country. While most non-internet users are of retirement age, 773,000 adults – equivalent to the population of Leeds – are under the age of 65.Polly Neate, chief executive of the homeless charity Shelter, has described the digital divide as "fast becoming a defining social justice issue of this crisis".On Monday, Jangala, a charity that specialises in providing the internet to humanitarian disaster zones, is shifting its focus to the UK with a trial to connect about 60 people at a homeless shelter in Brighton.The charity, which was founded five years ago to work in the so-called Calais "Jungle" camp, said it was shifting its attention to Britain after being alerted to a huge need since the lockdown began in March.Rich Thanki, Jangala's founder, said its UK trial would expand to other homeless shelters, schools and community centres around the country if successful. Its technology has been used in refugee camps across Europe and Africa, including in Calais where it was reputedly used by about 4,000 refugees a week, and the huge Kakuma camp in north-west Kenya, as well as in schools in Afghanistan and health clinics in Tanzania.Thanki said it was depressing that charities were having to step in to connect people in Britain, the world's sixth-biggest economy. Nick Gardham, the chief executive of the Community Organisers charity, said some single-parent families were having to "choose between data and food" so their children could complete schoolwork online. He welcomed the lifting of broadband data caps, in a deal struck by the government and telecoms firms, but said that would only help people "in the club" and not those who could not afford a monthly tariff.His charity is urging the government to open up the broadband infrastructure provided by BT Openzone and Virgin so hotspots can be used free of charge during the pandemic. Its Operation Wifi campaign has been backed by several charities including Shelter and AgeUK.Sacha Bedding, the manager of a community centre in Hartlepool's Dyke House – which is in one of the 2% most deprived communities in England – said internet access should be defined as a utility but there was "an unwillingness on a national level" to treat it as such. "There isn't a political will for it," he said. "There's an echo of it being seen as a luxury rather than a basic, essential necessity."

7:10 PM

The government must urgently ensure that more than 1 million children have reliable internet access at home or risk irreparable harm to the...

Read more »
no image

Snap, the company behind Snapchat, has revealed plans for a fully fledged digital platform taking on not only Facebook but also Google and Apple.

The company is launching an app store, expanding its games platform and offering the facility for external developers to upload machine-learning models to build augmented reality experiences. It is allowing other apps to integrate its camera software for the first time, and incorporating businesses into its maps alongside users' friends.The bold moves reflect Snap's growing confidence that Snapchat will remain the largest non-Facebook social network in the west. Despite a blip in growth in 2018, Snapchat has grown to 229 million daily users, outstripping Twitter's 166 million but lagging behind Facebook-owned Instagram and Facebook itself.Bobby Murphy, the company's co-founder and chief technology officer, told the Guardian: "In terms of the long-term future, we believe very strongly in the idea that computing overlaid on to the world, and augmented reality (AR) and the camera in particular, will be the foundation for the next major shift in technology."So you'll notice that in a lot of our announcements: AR and the camera is actually threading its way into many of the other things we're doing. We're at the early stages of seeing AR and the vision of the camera being the centre of computing coming together."The features announced by Snap at its annual developer summit, held virtually last week, are the early stage of that revolution. One series of tools, called Scan, let users identify plants, trees and dogs by pointing their camera at them. A planned integration with Yuka, a dieting app, will offer a similar function for packaged foods.Another new product lets developers build their own AI filters for cameras. Initially, the tool will probably be used to generate ever more inventive lenses for the company's messaging product – examples already include a filter that turns a video into the style of Van Gogh's Starry Night, and a simple hand-tracking tool that places stars at your fingertips.But Murphy says the goal is that eventually creativity will expand to include utility. Scan is "probably our best representative for pushing into non-creative AR, more utility-based AR", he said. "With AR specifically, what's really fascinating is that it quite literally transforms the way you see the world through your camera. It has tremendous potential to change the way we see the world. To educate, inform, help people connect with one another."In Snap's vision of the future, its camera platform replaces the home screen of a smartphone or the newsfeed of Facebook as the default starting point from where all other tasks begin. New AR technology is one way to achieve that, but another is getting more apps into the camera, and its camera in more apps.The latter is achieved by CameraKit, which lets other applications replace their default camera with Snapchat's. The idea is that there is mutual benefit: the app doesn't have to build a fully featured camera function if it just wants to include the ability to take or send photos, while Snapchat's camera platform becomes increasingly valuable to developers who might be on the fence about whether to build features for it.For the former, Snap launched Minis, a feature that allows for micro-apps to be embedded within SnapChat, which can be opened without installation. Examples include the meditation app Headspace; an app for putting together a schedule for the Coachella music festival; and a flashcard app, Tembo.If successful, the plan could lead to Snapchat becoming the closest the west has to a "super-app" like China's WeChat, where a single app can be the platform for a whole host of interactions.Or perhaps the company's aim is higher still. "We are definitely interested in wearable AR," Murphy said, "which would require a display on your face. That is, in our eyes, the best way to envision the future of AR."

7:10 PM

Snap, the company behind Snapchat, has revealed plans for a fully fledged digital platform taking on not only Facebook but also Google and ...

Read more »
Saturday, June 13, 2020
no image

It was on the morning of 18 March, when Glastonbury was confirmed cancelled, that Sarah Gresty, BA course leader in fashion at Central Saint Martins (CSM), realised that the class of 2020 would be a graduating year unlike any other.

"That was when we thought: OK, this is only heading one way. After that, everything happened really fast. That evening many of the international students started getting sent home, and were literally grabbing their things from the studios and heading to the airport." Within days, all students were told that there would be no final show. "It was traumatic," says Gresty. "For many of them, that show is a moment they had been dreaming about since they were children." I have spent the last week talking to class of 2020 graduates from all over the country, and a word I have heard time and again is "heartbreaking". They made it all the way to the final year of fashion college, only to find themselves in the right place at the wrong time, with college paused before the show that was meant to launch them into the world. A final-year fashion show, after all, is a night like no other – think prom meets Absolutely Fabulous meets Frieze. But there are other words I have heard a lot, too. Change. Opportunity. Sustainability. Reset. "I am proud to be part of the first generation of post-pandemic graduates," CSM student Viktorija Kozorezova tells me from her bedroom, where she is producing the wearable sculptures she had been planning to produce in the college metal workshop, but out of DIY filling foam instead. Maisie Crome, from Kingston School of Art, has spotted craft and homemade projects "all over Instagram, the TV news, everywhere. I specialise in knitwear and I chime on about handmade, about UK-made, so I'm really excited to be part of that movement." "I know for a fact," says Hannah Eleri Russell of the University for the Creative Arts Epsom, "that this time has made me look at clothes in my wardrobe in a different way. Given the level of overproduction, I hope this is a chance to consider caring for our clothes better and to learn new ways to mend and make pieces." Facebook Twitter Pinterest Have we kicked our fashion habit?: customers wait ahead of the Balmain x H&M launch on Regent Street, London, November 2015. Photograph: Ray Tang/Rex/Shutterstock Fashion has been taken apart at the seams by the coronavirus crisis – and the class of 2020 could be the ones to redesign and remake it. Graduate-level jobs in the industry often mean a move to an atelier in Paris, Milan or New York. But the globalised supply chains on which mass fashion depends in order to serve customers with the speed and low prices they now expect have been severed, and a question mark hangs over whether they can ever be safely resurrected. Thousands of independent designer labels whose survival depends on the sale of clothes that have been sitting behind shuttered shop doors since March look set to go bust. The British Fashion Council has warned that without substantial support, half the country's industry could be wiped out. At a meta level, there is a sense of a spell having been broken. The carousel of seasonal fashion trends broke down just as the spring/summer ride was getting started, throwing everyone off, to stumble indoors to their homes and comfy clothes. There is no guarantee that consumers will automatically dance to the beat of trends again. Sale-of-the-century discounts are likely this summer as retailers rush to shift stock – but will anyone want an expensive keepsake of a season they spent indoors and anxious? How do we try on clothes safely? What happens to fashion week, now that squishing hundreds of people from all over the world on to packed benches so they can take pictures on their phones seems, well, loopy? And – biggest of all, this – how will this unexpected quarantine of shopping impact on consumer demand? Have we kicked our fashion habit? And what will that mean for a generation hoping to make a living creating clothes? We need to build a new fashion system that is ethical and equal, and empowers young people "Fashion will survive. Creativity will always find its way, I'm not worried about that," says Jefferson Hack, co-founder and CEO of Dazed Media. Fashion, after all, was one of the first industries to repurpose itself, with designers pivoting to the production of masks and gowns for frontline workers. "What I am concerned about is the bad deal that young people get in this country. Long before coronavirus, the younger generation were being hung out to dry economically and politically. The generation Dazed is for have inherited a messed-up environment and an insecure economy. We need to build a new fashion system that is ethical and equal, and empowers young people." Many students tell me of jobs that had been advertised disappearing from recruitment websites. Some who planned to begin postgraduate courses in the autumn have deferred, waiting to see how the chips fall, while others who hoped to find employment are opting for further study. Many are wrestling with emotional fallout alongside the logistical issues. "I always felt left out by traditional educational methods," says Thomas Robert, a fashion promotion student at Manchester Metropolitan University (MMU). "High school was tough and so was college. University has been the making of me as a person, and I feel deflated that I will not get to celebrate this amazing milestone in my life." Another MMU student, Deanna Barber, says: "I know this won't last for ever, but it feels like my goals have got much further away. A lot of uncertainty – about income, happiness, sense of achievement – has entered my life." That uncertainty is felt right up to the top of the fashion food chain. "I feel very strongly that when we come out at the other end, people's values are really going to have shifted," Anna Wintour said recently. "It is an opportunity for all of us to look at our industry… and really think about the waste and the amount of money and consumption and excess that we've all – and I obviously include myself in this – that we've all indulged in. We really need to rethink what this industry stands for." Fashion, after all, should be about change. "Positives can and will come out of this," says Emma Hope Allwood, head of fashion at Dazed Digital. "We have been given what we never had before: time and distance to work out what we want our industry to look like. This crisis has made the waste and the excess more visible." The ingenuity required to complete studies during lockdown has prompted students to think outside fashion's ribbon-tied box. One student, no longer able to source the buttons she wanted, went beachcombing for shells and used those instead. Another, who had planned to shoot her collection on a model friend in the city where she studied, found herself isolating in the country with her parents and had to switch to using her mother. Seeing the clothes on her mum unexpectedly made them look even stronger, she says. When fashion students and established designers are canvassed about the future of fashion, a remarkable consensus emerges: almost everyone wants to ditch overproduction and waste. But almost everyone wants to save the fashion show. I'll wait four years for Frank Ocean to make an album. I can wait more than three months for a brand to do a show Fashion has become bloated. Collections are too big and too frequent. "We have too much product," as Joseph Altuzarra put it bluntly to Vogue recently, and it is produced to a trend cycle that has become unintelligible. Coats now have to go on sale in July to shift them before the sundresses hit the shop floor in November. The internal workings of a schedule yoked to outmoded department-store logic has come unmoored from common sense. Giorgio Armani has announced that his next haute couture collection will be seasonless, with pieces for all climates, and denounced the churn of high-speed fashion as "criminal" and "absurd". Designers Dries Van Noten and Marine Serre, and retailers Selfridges in the UK and Lane Crawford in Hong Kong and mainland China, are among the signatories of an open letter proposing a "reset" to the seasons. They want collections to be on sale for longer, with less emphasis on the "extra" seasons of resort and high summer. The late Azzedine Alaïa, who refused to conform to Paris fashion week schedules and showed his collections as and when he felt they were ready and appropriate, is being hailed as ahead of his time. "I'll wait four years for Frank Ocean to make an album," notes Dazed Digital's Hope Allwood. "I can wait more than three months for a brand to do a show." But the fashion show – for all its bad press as a gaudy totem of excess – still has a magic, one many designers want to rediscover in a new, more modern form. For the rest of 2020 at least, social distancing seems set to put paid to fashion weeks as we have known them. "It's pretty clear that if the September shows do happen – and that's a very big if at this point – they will be completely different," says Imran Amed, founder and CEO of the Business of Fashion. "I look back to the shows in February, where we were all squeezed in like sardines, and that seems like another world. I don't think fashion week will look the same this year – and then the question is, does that change become permanent?" The fashion show at its best can be an electric collective experience, immersive theatre at its best. But in the last decade, Hollywood-scale set-building and guests flown in from all over the world have contributed to a spectacle of excess, pickled in champagne and reeking of carbon. There is a strong desire to bring back the magic, without the circus. For many labels, cost-cutting will be an economic necessity – and even for the luxury houses best placed to ride this out, there is the matter of tone. "The narrative of fashion as a symbol of excess isn't always warranted," says Hope Allwood, "but in a post-pandemic world brands will not want to be seen to embody it." This vintage of graduates are firmly generation Z, the first to have grown up fully digital native. They are perfectly poised to do what fashion designers have been attempting to do, but not quite pulling off, for the past two decades, and reinvent the fashion show as a digital-first event. "Until now, digital has always been peripheral to fashion week," says Amed. "Digital has meant a show produced for a live audience and then broadcast. Or an Instagrammable moment – but that depends on a live audience who are there Instagramming it. This could be the moment when fashion week becomes, by necessity, created primarily for digital consumption." Why stop at Instagram and YouTube: Fashion Week x Netflix, anyone? Big brands need to work with young trailblazers, who know how to be engaging and fun The crisis has, Amed points out, broken down outmoded fashion snobberies toward digital. With conferences and shows cancelled, many of the grandest names have found their way on to less polished forms of communication. Marc Jacobs loves a Zoom chat; Olivier Rousteing, creative director of Balmain, is on TikTok. "There is an opportunity for young people here, because there are still so many brands who really have no idea when it comes to digital content. Now is the time for them to be working with the young trailblazers who understand how to create work that is fun and engaging. This is going to be a more marketable skill than ever before," says Amed. Many of this year's graduates are ahead of this curve. Earlier this year, long before the logistical impact of the pandemic was being felt, Heriot-Watt University in Scotland had already decided to replace the traditional fashion show with a new, more sustainable format showing final work digitally through video, film and photography. At CSM, five of this year's 109 graduates had opted for entirely virtual final collections before the crisis began to unfold. Scarlett Yang, a student who has been collaborating with brands on 3D animations and virtual reality showcases, tells me she now "has more offers of work than I had before". Jessica Gray, 23, a matchesfashion.com scholar at CSM, says her final collection "represents the overwhelming effect of the screen interfering in our lives. If that wasn't a premonition, I don't know what is!" The crisis has accelerated a shift towards a more waste-conscious mindset. One student who had had his heart set on a beautiful silk that ended up shuttered in a locked-down Italian factory has made his final collection using a bedsheet donated by his parents instead. Another, with bracing can-do spirit, is embroidering on to loo roll. And while some internships in Paris and Milan have been cancelled, others are happening online. The savings on travel and accommodation not only make for a smaller carbon footprint, but opportunities that are more accessible to students with less financial support, as Gresty points out. The coming generation have the opportunity to make sustainability a core value. "Young people will emerge from this period wanting to buy for the future, to buy secondhand – just to make better choices, even if that's buying something on Depop knowing you can flip it again later," says Hope Allwood. "If your business doesn't care about leaving the world in a better shape through your practice, you will make yourself irrelevant." Facebook Twitter Pinterest Nigerian influencer Angel Obasi wearing a face mask in Lagos, Nigeria May 2020. Photograph: Temilade Adelaja/Reuters Today's 20-year-olds, who have grown up with the climate emergency at the centre of their world view, see environmental impact as an essential part of thinking about fashion, rather than a notion at loggerheads with it. "I think the entire seasonal cycle should adapt itself to the climate crisis," says Saskia Purr, a student at Nottingham Trent University. "Climate change is making our winters warmer and our summers longer." It is becoming fashionable, in industry circles, to propose that the way forward for fashion is to turn the clock back. "You know what fashion should have done? We should have stuck to our guns," says Bebe Moratti, founder of the Italian ethical luxury brand Redemption. The fashion system, he says, should step away from the mass-consumption gravy train. "People say you can't go back to the old ways, but that's exactly what the brands that have survived the longest have done. Look at Hermès. That is what the dynamic of fashion should be – an investment in something that's beautifully made, something that you love, a transaction that supports the person that made it. So, is my business model crazy, to go back to a place where we cherish what we buy, where we cherish the workers, where we cherish the environment? No. It's not crazy at all. It works." "This crisis has made the nation less materialistic," says Bournemouth student Ffion McCormick-Edwards. "We have stayed connected by talking about what we are looking forward to: things like a family barbecue, or a party with friends, or seeing our grandparents." Despite the blow of missing out on graduation, "I wouldn't say this term has been all loss," says fashion knitwear student Rhiannon Davies. "My collection has become a lot more authentic to me, because doing it at home has cut off the many voices that I would find distracting at university. Facing myself – and my own company – is something I don't usually do a lot of. I almost feel I've found myself in the process." Still, the class of 2020 has been dealt a harsh blow. "I think the biggest loss is not the show itself, but the camaraderie around it," says Gresty. "The last seven weeks before a show is sheer hard work, tears, panic, but also this amazing energy, supporting each other through the fatigue – and then coming together in celebration. Not having that is tough." Despite the hardships of this term, she sees a bright future. "Students keep saying to me, 'We're so unlucky to be in this year – why us?' and I say, 'Are you joking? You are lucky. This is such a special year. This is the year that everyone will remember for ever.'" Topics Fashion Class of 2020: a Weekend magazine graduate special Graduation Anna Wintour Dries Van Noten Instagram YouTube Zoom features Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via Email Share on LinkedIn Share on Pinterest Share on WhatsApp Share on Messenger Reuse this content

5:01 PM

It was on the morning of 18 March, when Glastonbury was confirmed cancelled, that Sarah Gresty, BA course leader in fashion at Central Sa...

Read more »
no image

So IBM has seen the light on facial recognition technology.

On Monday, in a dramatic and surprisingly passionate statement (at least for the CEO of a major tech company), Arvind Krishna called on the US Congress to enact reforms to advance racial justice and combat systemic racism, while announcing that his company was getting out of the facial recognition business.In his letter, Mr Krishna said that "IBM no longer offers general-purpose IBM facial recognition or analysis software" and "firmly opposes and will not condone uses of any technology, including facial recognition technology offered by other vendors, for mass surveillance, racial profiling, violations of basic human rights and freedoms, or any purpose which is not consistent with our values and principles of trust and transparency. We believe now is the time to begin a national dialogue on whether and how facial recognition technology should be employed by domestic law enforcement agencies."Amen to that. No sooner had the letter been released than cynics and sceptics were poring over it for the get-out clause. IBM was never a big player in the facial recognition game, said some, and so it's no sacrifice to exit it: to them, Krishna's letter was just "virtue- signalling". Yet two days later Amazon heard the signal and announced a one-year suspension of police force use of its Rekognition facial recognition software – they say they'd like Congress to pass stronger regulation around it.The IBM announcement and now Amazon's are a big deal. Just ponder their significance for a moment: two major tech companies have declared that a technology that its industry (and governments of all stripes, everywhere) regards as the biggest thing since, well, internet search, is toxic. This is still news to the evangelists of machine learning, and maybe also to many police authorities and government ministers, but it will come as no surprise to regular readers of this column. I wrote about it just over a year ago, for example, citing a startling essay by Luke Stark, a Microsoft researcher, who called facial recognition "the plutonium of AI". The technology, he said, was "dangerous, racialising, and has few legitimate uses; facial recognition needs regulation and control on par with nuclear waste".To date, that warning (often echoed by other concerned experts) has fallen on deaf ears. Or, more accurately, on ears that do not want to hear it. For them, there's too much revenue in this to entertain doubts about societal damage. The commercial and governmental worlds have been salivating at the potential of facial recognition technology. Shops want to be able to identify customers in real time as they come through the door. Firms want it to make sure that only authorised personnel enter offices. Universities and schools want it to track student attendance at classes. Police forces want it to increase the effectiveness of stop-and-search operations. And on top of everything else, there's the geopolitical angle: China is using the technology everywhere and the preservation of US hegemony depends on us getting on top of it before Chinese tech sweeps the world market. It's Huawei on steroids, in other words.From the outset, it was obvious that digital technology enabled surveillance of astonishing comprehensiveness. If anyone doubted that, then Edward Snowden removed all grounds for doubt in 2013. But real-time facial recognition is the most toxic manifestation to date of the technology's dystopian potential, because it finally closes the loop. For if surveillance is to be really effective, it must enable tangible (re)action.It's not just enough for people to fear that they are perpetually being watched, in other words; it's when the watchers have the capability for automated instant reaction that the penny drops for the watched. This capability is already being deployed in China. Cameras scan pedestrian crossings and roadways looking for jaywalkers. When transgressors are spotted, they are instantly identified by name and their images are displayed on large screens in the street. From there it's a small step to also make a deduction from their "social credit" scores or issue a fine.As I write this, I can hear the standard response of tech evangelists to criticism: technology is neither good not bad – it all depends on how it's used. And that's at least an arguable proposition. What makes facial recognition interesting, though, is that it may be an exception to that rule, a technology that is so toxic that it should be generally illegal and only deployed in tightly controlled circumstances. In that sense, it should be treated like we treat plutonium. And just as the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence decides which medicines and techniques should be available in the NHS, our societies now need an equivalent body to decide whether technologies such as facial recognition should be deployed and under what circumstances. And sometimes, such a body will just have to say "no".What I've been readingThe Gospel of PeterTara Isabella Burton has written an interesting profile of Silicon Valley's leading contrarian, PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel.Radical thoughts on parentingThere's a fascinating conversation on The Correspondent site with Alison Gopnik, the psychologist whose work on how children learn is profound.Eternal Zoom doomBenedict Evans has written a truly insightful essay on his blog about why technology can't mimic face-to-face events.

5:01 PM

So IBM has seen the light on facial recognition technology. On Monday, in a dramatic and surprisingly passionate statement (at least for t...

Read more »
 
Google Analytics Alternative