Random Post

Thursday, June 4, 2020
no image

Britain's intelligence agencies are working urgently to prevent hackers from hostile states, including China, trying to steal the secrets of a potential coronavirus vaccine, the head of GCHQ has said.

Jeremy Fleming, said hackers – including those from hostile states – were targeting the UK's health infrastructure and some of its world-leading research labs, often by using simple techniques."We do know that, whether it's states or criminals, they are going after things which are sensitive to us," the director general said in a rare interview to the Cheltenham science festival. "So, it's a high priority for us to protect the health sector, particularly the race to acquire a vaccine."He said hackers were often "looking for pretty basic vulnerabilities" such as "lures to get people to click on the wrong thing ... where people aren't backing up properly, or where they've got basic passwords and so on."The chief of the signals intelligence agency did not directly name China or any other country as being behind the cyber-attacks on the NHS and British research labs, but sources indicated that Beijing was often believed to be involved.Elsewhere in the interview, which was recorded three weeks earlier, Fleming described China as, in part, "an intelligence adversary", and said the UK had to navigate a complex relationship with Beijing, made more acute by the pandemic."For the UK, we see China as an intelligence adversary, we see them as an economic partner, we work with them in some areas, we compete with them in others, and in still others, we call out their behaviours when we don't think they align with what we expect to see or with our values."Britain's intelligence agencies have been pressing for both a reassessment of the UK's relationship with Beijing, arguing that Britain needs to reduce its dependence on Chinese technology and medical supplies, and a more realistic appreciation of the intelligence threat.Others, however, have gone further, claiming that coronavirus may have leaked from a high-security disease research lab in Wuhan, and that, in contrast to the prevailing research, it may be humanmade.Sir Richard Dearlove, who was in charge of MI6 in the runup to the Iraq war, told the Daily Telegraph on Wednesday that he had seen "very important" research suggesting there were "inserted sections" on the structures that bind the Covid-19 strain on to human cells.The research – by Prof Angus Dalgleish, of St George's hospital at the University of London and a former Ukip candidate, and the Norwegian virologist Birger Sorensen – goes against the prevailing scientific and security opinion, which says the virus emerged from horseshoe bats and was passed on to humans via an intermediate animal, such as a pangolin.Whitehall sources reacted with dismay to Dearlove's intervention, the latest in a long campaign of briefing aimed at justifying a lab leak theory pushed by the US president, Donald Trump. They reiterated they saw no evidence to justify the claim by the former MI6 boss.Last month, Andrew Parker, who was the head of MI5 until April, said of the origins of the coronavirus: "I'm just not aware of any evidence that it is anything other than what people think it is: it came via markets. There are all sorts of hypotheses around, but I just think it is not useful to speculate [or] worry about all that."

1:25 PM

Britain's intelligence agencies are working urgently to prevent hackers from hostile states, including China, trying to steal the secre...

Read more »
no image

Zoom, the popular video conferencing platform, has announced it will provide end-to-end encryption after facing a litany of privacy and security concerns – but only to users who pay for it.

Eric Yuan, the company's CEO, raised alarm among privacy advocates on Wednesday by saying Zoom planned to exclude free calls from end-to-end encryption so as to leave open the possibility of working with law enforcement. "Free users for sure we don't want to give [end-to-end encryption] because we also want to work together with FBI, with local law enforcement in case some people use Zoom for a bad purpose," Yuan said on the call with analysts.Privacy and security experts say encryption, which secures communication so that it can only be read by the users involved, is particularly important at a time when video apps and other digital platforms are being used for sensitive issues such as organizing protests, discussing legal issues and attending medical appointments."Basic security shouldn't be a premium feature that's only available to wealthy individuals and big corporations," said Evan Greer, the deputy director at Fight for the Future, a digital rights advocacy that previously organized a campaign demanding Zoom increase user security. "It's just plain gross for the company to say they'll only keep your calls safe and secure if you pay extra."Greer also expressed concern that such comments play into ongoing attacks on encryption from officials such as the attorney general William Barr, who has called on companies such as Apple to provide back doors into encrypted devices for law enforcement purposes. They also come as the US considers the Earn It Act, proposed legislation that would hold companies accountable for content distributed on their platform, putting encryption at risk. A spokesman from Zoom said the company already offers basic encryption for users of all tiers. He added that Zoom does not "proactively monitor meeting content"."We do not share information with law enforcement except in circumstances like child sex abuse," he said. "We do not have backdoors where anyone can enter meetings without being visible to others. None of this will change."The decision could set a dangerous precedent for privacy, said Tim Wade, the technical director at the cybersecurity firm Vectra."In an online world, encryption is paramount to privacy, and privacy promotes safety, liberty and fairness into our social fabric," he said. "Gating personal privacy behind a paywall erodes basic freedoms and fairness."The encryption concerns are just the latest in a long line of criticisms Zoom has faced as its popularity soared during coronavirus lockdowns, as millions staying home from school and work turned to Zoom to connect.Zoom previously falsely advertised itself as using end-to-end encryption and, once caught, confirmed in a blogpost that end-to-end encryption was not possible on the platform.Meanwhile incidents of trollsattacking users on the app with slurs and offensive imagery – known as Zoom-bombing – also rose. Zoom added security measures in response, but the issue is ongoing.On the call, Yuan also outlined just how much the popularity of Zoom has surged in recent months. Zoom expects to generate up to $1.8bn in revenue this fiscal year, according to Bloomberg analysts on the call, triple what it generated last year. Yuan said Zoom is seeing as many as 300 million daily participants on the app, up from just 10 million in December.

1:25 PM

Zoom, the popular video conferencing platform, has announced it will provide end-to-end encryption after facing a litany of privacy and sec...

Read more »
no image

My 100-zip black backpack, previously the logistical and geek centre of my life, now sits neglected in a corner, not needed since Covid-19 abruptly halted my near-constant travel schedule.

Life went on – with limited disruption, if not quite as normal. After all, I have enough space, equipment and internet connectivity to work comfortably from home. In some ways, life has become more efficient. Less jet lag. More sanity. I'm hardly alone in experiencing this. Those of us fortunate to have jobs we can do from home have tidied up our video conference backdrops and changed how we operate. Where they can, many children have adapted, more or less, to virtual classrooms and the need to compete for workspace with their parents. We keep in touch with loved ones via computer screens in ways we couldn't have imagined only three months ago, while the crisis has spawned myriad coping mechanisms – from a boom in online quizzes, art classes and workouts to a golden age for memes. And while many of us are cooped up indoors, we have seen examples of great collective endeavour and support: communities coming together to help each other and the most vulnerable, albeit keeping two metres apart. In all of these things, the web has been the critical unifying force, enabling work, school, social activity and mutual support. Always intended as a platform for creativity and collaboration at a distance, it is great to see it also being used more than ever for compassion at a distance too. This is all very well, of course, if we have the web at our fingertips. But we are the lucky ones. Billions of people don't have the option to turn to the web in times of need or normality. A gross digital divide holds back almost half the planet when it most needs the web. In Africa, only one in four people can access the web and the benefits that so many of us take for granted This divide is most acutely experienced in developing countries. The position is particularly dire across Africa, where only one in four people can access the web and the benefits that so many of us take for granted. Women, in particular, in the developing world, are excluded, with men 21% more likely to have online access – rising to 52% in the world's least developed countries. The challenge extends to the wealthiest nations, too: 60,000 children in the UK have no internet at home and device poverty stops many more from learning online while schools remain closed. In the US, an estimated 12 million children live in homes without broadband connectivity, and people are parking cars outside schools and cafes, desperate for a connection good enough to learn and work "from home". These inequalities fall along the familiar lines of wealth, race and rural v urban divides. Working from home isn't an option for many — including some who have jobs that could be done remotely. Businesses in areas without the infrastructure to trade online are denied a lifeline that is keeping others around the world afloat.  The Alliance for Affordable Internet, an initiative of the World Wide Web Foundation, which was the foundation that I co-founded with Rosemary Leith, has outlined urgent actions that governments and companies should take to provide this lifeline to more people as quickly as possible. We're in a world where it is so much harder to get by without the web. And yet the digital divide won't disappear once this crisis is over. The ever-quickening march to digitisation has become a sprint. We must make sure those currently in the slow lane have the means to catch up. Otherwise billions will be left behind in the dust. As Covid-19 forces huge change to our lives, we have an opportunity for big, bold action that recognises that, as with electricity in the last century and postal services before that, the web is an essential utility that governments and business should combine to deliver as a basic right. History shows us that after all great global upheavals there are major attempts to repair the damage and rebuild, with some more successfully delivered than others. In the midst of this turmoil we must surely strive to ensure some good emerges out of the darkness. The web can and must be for everyone — now is our moment to make this happen. We have the technical means to connect the entire world in meaningful and affordable ways: we now need the will and the investment. Governments must lead the way. They must invest in network infrastructure, not only in urban centres, but in rural settings where market forces alone fail to connect residents. And because data affordability remains one of the biggest barriers to access, these networks must be efficient. For example, policies that encourage service providers to share network infrastructure, and regulations designed to shape competitive markets for data, can go a long way towards bringing down costs for users.  And, to connect everyone, governments will need to target typically excluded groups – including people on low incomes, women, and those in rural areas. This means funding public access and digital literacy initiatives to ensure everyone has the skills to use the internet in meaningful ways. Service providers must invest in network performance, reliability and coverage so that everyone is within reach of high-quality connectivity. We have seen experiments with drones, balloons and satellites to connect hard-to-reach areas. While these don't replace good policy and investment in proven technologies, innovation such as this is a welcome addition to the mix. There is nothing to stop governments and companies making a choice now, to accelerate progress on connectivity where good changes are happening and to step up where they aren't. Demand action from your government to make universal internet connectivity a priority Finally, we can all play a role as individuals. If you've relied on the web recently, don't you owe it to the other half of the world to help them get that lifeline, too? Demand action from your government to make universal internet connectivity a priority. Support a technology NGO such as the World Wide Web Foundation. Back the Contract for the Web — a collaborative project to build a better web, with universal connectivity as a key priority. Just as people campaign for clean water and access to education, we need a global campaign for universal internet access. We must, of course, be more alert than ever to the web's shortfalls – the privacy violations, the misinformation and the online gender-based violence that has become far too familiar. But these very real problems must not deter us from achieving the foundational challenge of making the web available to all. Universal internet access unlikely until at least 2050, experts say Read more Just as the world decided that electricity and water were basic needs that should reach everyone, no matter the cost, we should recognise that now is our moment to fight for the web as a basic right. Let's be the generation that delivers universal internet access. Sir Tim Berners-Lee invented the world wide web. He is co-founder of the World Wide Web Foundation and chief technology officer at Inrupt Topics Internet Opinion Tim Berners-Lee Coronavirus outbreak Inequality Technology sector Broadband Zoom comment Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via Email Share on LinkedIn Share on Pinterest Share on WhatsApp Share on Messenger Reuse this content

1:25 PM

My 100-zip black backpack, previously the logistical and geek centre of my life, now sits neglected in a corner, not needed since Covid-1...

Read more »
no image

The Facebook accounts of several high-profile bloggers and activists in Tunisia were among those deactivated without warning over the weekend.

Up to 60 accounts are understood to have been deactivated, including that of journalist and political commentator Haythem El Mekki.At least 14 accounts have since been restored, but no explanation has been given for the action by the social media giant."They received no warning, no advance notice and still have no explanation," said Emna Mizouni, an activist and journalist who campaigns for an open internet. "In the end we were able to get 14 restored by going to [the anti-corruption watchdog] IWatch … but know nothing about the rest."Facebook use is high in Tunisia, with many people crediting the platform for providing a rallying point for activists and bloggers during the country's 2011 revolution that overthrew Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali."In Tunisia, the internet equals Facebook," said Mizouni. "It was a really important tool during the revolution. We used it to organise events and share videos of what was happening across the country."After cementing itself at the centre of much of Tunisia's public conversation, politicians and ministries use Facebook to communicate directly with the people. According to online advocacy group AccessNow, around 60% of Tunisian are Facebook users, one of the highest uptakes of the platform within the region.El Mekki first became aware that his account had been deactivated last Friday. "It just said that my account had been deactivated and that was my final notice," he said. "There wasn't really any negotiation."Given his high profile and occasionally incendiary comments, El Mekki is not a stranger to controversy. However, having his account arbitrarily deactivated came as a surprise."I still don't know what happened," he said. "It would be flattering to believe that we had been targeted, but I think it's just as likely that an algorithm got out of control."Whatever the causes, over the past nine years the country's relationship with Facebook has changed. "I think one of the main dangers is that it's not transparent to Tunisians," said Mizouni. "For instance, during last year's elections, we were unable to find out who was paying for what political adverts and why, despite several requests from NGOs to do so."Facebook did eventually respond to the NGOs' requests some months later, although its letter failed to address the specific concerns raised. When contacted by the Guardian contacted about the deactivated accounts, the company said: "Due to a technical error we recently removed a small number of profiles, which have now been restored. We were not trying to limit anyone's ability to post or express themselves, and apologise for any inconvenience this has caused." This article was edited on 4 June 2020 to include a response from Facebook

1:25 PM

The Facebook accounts of several high-profile bloggers and activists in Tunisia were among those deactivated without warning over the weeke...

Read more »
Wednesday, June 3, 2020
no image

The teleconferencing company Zoom has seen a massive increase in profits and has doubled its annual sales forecast, driven by a surge in users as more people work from home and connect with friends online during the coronavirus crisis.

 The once-obscure Zoom Video Communications, which has rapidly emerged as the latest Silicon Valley gold mine, released financial results on Tuesday showing the astronomical growth that has turned it into a stock market star.Zoom's boom has come despite privacy problems that enabled outsiders to make uninvited and sometimes crude appearances during other peoples video conferences. Zoom's revenue for its fiscal first-quarter between February and April more than doubled from the same time last year to $328m, turning a profit of $27m compared with $198,000 a year ago.The numbers exceeded analysts already heightened expectations, providing another lift to a rocketing stock that has more than tripled in price so far this year. After a big run-up leading up to Tuesday's highly anticipated announcement, Zoom's stock gained nearly 3% in extended trading to $213.60 – more than five times the company's initial public offering price of $36 less than 14 months ago. The surge has left Zoom with a market value of about $59bn greater than the combined market values of the four largest US airlines, which have seen their businesses hammered by the coronavirus outbreak that has dramatically curtailed travel."We were humbled by the accelerated adoption of the Zoom platform around the globe," said boss Eric Yuan, who co-founded the company nine years ago.In a sign that its growth is not expected to be short lived, Zoom forecast revenue of roughly $500m for its current quarter ending in July, more than quadrupling from the same time last year. For its full fiscal year, Zoom now expects revenue of about $1.8bn, nearly tripling in a year.Security issues prompted some schools to stop using Zoom for online classes that have become widespread since February, although the company's efforts to introduce more security protection has brought some back to the service. More than 100,000 schools worldwide are now using Zoom for online classes, according to the company.But the once-weak privacy controls also helped make Zoom extremely easy to use, one of the reasons it became such a popular way to hold online classes, business meetings and virtual cocktail hours after most of the US began ordering people to stay at home in effort to reduce the spread of the novel coronavirus that causes Covid-19.Zoom also offers a free version of its service, another factor in its popularity at a time when about 40 million people in the US have lost their jobs since mid-March, raising the specter of the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression of the 1930s.The San Jose, California-based company has always made most of its money from companies that subscribe to a more sophisticated version of its service that traditionally has been used for business meetings among employees working in offices far apart from each other.But the pandemic-driven shutdown turned Zoom into a tool for employees who once worked alongside each other, but have been doing their jobs from home during the past few months.Zoom ended April with 265,400 corporate customers with at least 10 employees, more than quadrupling from the same time last year.Although Zoom remains focused on servicing its corporate customers, Yuan is hoping to figure out ways to make money from the all the socialising and education taking place on the service, too. Some analysts have speculated that Zoom may eventually show ads on the free version of Zoom, although the company has not given any indication it will do that. 

5:18 PM

The teleconferencing company Zoom has seen a massive increase in profits and has doubled its annual sales forecast, driven by a surge in us...

Read more »
no image

Researchers hope the addition of Facebook de-identified movement data will give a better overview of people slowly returning to their regular travels as we emerge from the coronavirus lockdown period, and help identify any potential places where physical distancing may be an issue.

Several companies, including Google, Apple and Citymapper, make public de-identified data from their mapping and other location-based apps to track traffic flow across cities, states and countries.Researchers have been using this data to model the massive traffic reductions seen as public health orders were put in place, businesses closed and some people began working from home.Citymapper, for example, shows a dip in regular traffic levels in Melbourne commencing around 12 March, dropping right down to a low of 10% of regular traffic levels in mid-April. It has now bounced back to 25%, while Sydney is up to 31%.That aligned with data from Google and Apple in a report put together by a group of Australian researchers.From Wednesday, Facebook will make public its own aggregated data set based on location data, which users can opt out of providing to Facebook through their privacy settings.Dr Nic Geard, a senior lecturer in computing and information systems at the University of Melbourne, told Guardian Australia researchers at the university hope to integrate the Facebook data into the data already being used from the other sources because it is more granular than what is on offer, down to a local government area rather than just a city or state level."We can get a slightly more detailed perspective in how physical distancing behaviour is changing across countries, different ways different spaces as different levels of restrictions are relaxed," he said."But we're still sort of working on the process of how we will integrate that information into the data stream into the modelling work that we're doing."At the moment, Geard said the data on Australia was showing a varied rise in traffic as restrictions ease, depending on the level of restrictions.Geard said, for example, movement in places where restrictions had been eased faster, such as Western Australia, was increasing faster than Victoria, where easing had been slower."We can see that corresponding signal coming out of the data in terms of the increase in the amount of movement," he said.There was also a difference in the data between regional and metropolitan areas, he said, because people in regional areas tend to need to travel longer distances for essential activity and that can register as a movement, while a person living in an urban area popping out to their local supermarket would not.While the data is more granular, Alex Pompe, from Facebook's data for good team, told Guardian Australia precautions had been taken to prevent individuals from being identified in the data sets.For starters, there is a threshold of 300 people in an area before the data is collected, and second, noise is added to the dataset."Basically, it's impossible to tell if an individual is even present in the dataset. So if they were to change their settings and withdraw their data from Facebook, we wouldn't even be able to tell the difference," he said.Geard said that he thought it was "exceedingly unlikely" someone could be identified even if all the datasets were combined."I think it's exceedingly unlikely just because all of the metrics that we're using are aggregated metrics, so there's never a point where we have something which says this is information about an individual user and something that an individual user did," he said."It's all about looking at estimates of what a large number of people were doing at that time in terms of whether they were present or absent in a particular area."Facebook is also publishing Covid-19 maps and data from surveys taken from a sample of Facebook users across the globe who have told Facebook they have coronavirus-like symptoms.

5:18 PM

Researchers hope the addition of Facebook de-identified movement data will give a better overview of people slowly returning to their regul...

Read more »
no image

A groundbreaking survey of Facebook users suggests that around 1% of Britons are showing symptoms for Covid-19 at any given time, with the proportion in Scotland rising as high as 3.

5% over the last week. The findings are part of Facebook's Covid-19 symptom survey, a global effort on the part of the company to use its enormous user base to track the spread of the virus. Since its launch in April, around 120,000 people in the UK have taken part in the survey, registering the presence or absence of Covid-19 symptoms by following a prompt from the social network. Globally, there have been more than 10m responses, the company said. The survey is being run in collaboration with statisticians at the University of Maryland, who worked with Facebook's Data for Good team to build a publicly available map and dashboard visualising the international results. "By fielding questions that are comparable globally the UK is benefiting from additional data that will be even more valuable going forward as we jointly examine the conditions for reopening in different countries under different scenarios," said Dr Frauke Kreuter, the director of the university's joint programme in survey methodology. The symptom survey differs from a number of others in its selection process. Many large-scale symptom surveys require users to opt-in to the survey, by proactively downloading an app or visiting a website. That risks biasing the results, if certain demographics are more likely to volunteer themselves, or if people proactively join the survey when they begin experiencing symptoms. "Survey methodologists and statisticians at UMD value particularly the fact that people cannot self-select into the respondent pool, Kreuter said. "Unlike surveys done via specific apps or websites designed to collect symptom data, the recruitment through the Facebook platform allows us to reach everyone who is using Facebook, and then randomly select within those users." For the UK at large, the symptom tracker shows a slow but steady reduction in the number of people reporting Covid symptoms, from slightly over 1% at the beginning of May to slightly under 1% now. Within the nations of the UK, the data is noisier for smaller nations, with Scotland reporting zero symptoms some days, and as high as 4% other days – a sign that the programme still has work to do to improve the quality of the data it collects. As well as the surveys, Facebook also analysed location data from its ubiquitous surveillance of its own users to show the extent to which Brits are changing their behaviour as the requirements to stay at home are lifted. At the beginning of April, 46% of English people were staying in place, Facebook's tracking revealed, while that figure has dropped by a quarter, to 36.9%, in the latest data. Similar declines were seen in Northern Ireland, Wales and Scotland. In this, Facebook's data is similar to that gathered by Google and Apple through their mapping programmes, released much earlier in the Covid crisis. All three companies have seen mobility rise significantly from the lockdown lows, with some countries, including the US and Germany, returning to normality, as measured by requests for directions. Topics Coronavirus outbreak Facebook Scotland news Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via Email Share on LinkedIn Share on Pinterest Share on WhatsApp Share on Messenger Reuse this content

5:18 PM

A groundbreaking survey of Facebook users suggests that around 1% of Britons are showing symptoms for Covid-19 at any given time, with th...

Read more »
 
Google Analytics Alternative