Random Post

Wednesday, December 11, 2013
no image
leo status

There are a number of ephemeral messaging apps out there (some might say too many), all of which are trying to give their users the ability to send self-destructing text messages or photos or videos, or some combination of the three. But those apps aren’t always intuitive, and that sometimes leads them to be used in ways that weren’t intended.


In a world where ephemeral messaging apps run wild, wouldn’t it be nice to have one that was fun and easy, but would still allow you to communicate with groups and share photos and videos and text messages all in one place?


That’s what Leo hopes to be.


Enter Leo


The idea behind Leo, which is available for both iOS and Android, is to provide an ultra-lightweight platform for one-on-one and group conversations. The fact that its message disappear will cause some to draw comparisons between it and all the other ephemeral messaging apps out there, but that kind of misses the point.


Yes, its messages self-destruct after a few seconds, but the rationale behind doing so isn’t necessarily about privacy. For Leo co-founder Carlos Whitt, the ephemeral nature of the app is more about getting rid of the “cognitive load” that comes with photos or videos being saved or shared in public.


People act and share differently when they know that a photo or video will live forever, the thinking goes. One need only look at Instagram and the all-too-perfectly filtered photos that appear there to know what Whitt is talking about. The impetus behind Leo, then, is to be able to share what you’re doing without having to worry too much about what happens to it.


In this new world, though, photos, text, and video are all disposable. And that will (hopefully) make users want to share more.


leo


Making sharing lightweight isn’t just about having messages that float off into the ether after a few seconds. It’s also about getting the message out in the smallest number of clicks possible, and being able to quickly skim through a conversation as it’s happening.


That’s where Leo really excels.


Once you’ve started a conversation or been added to one, you follow what everyone in a group says through a linear conversation “stack,” with each photo or text message disappearing after five seconds. (Videos can be up to 10 seconds long.) Or if you’re impatient, you can skip to the next message by swiping the current one away.


To post your own message, it takes just a few clicks to contribute to it. At the bottom of the screen there’s one button for video, one for photos and one for text. Just select your media, shoot your moment, add (optional) text, and send to the group. It’s that simple.


“We wanted to make the easiest way to share things going on in your life, with the least amount of clicks to get there,” Whitt told me.


A Man Walks Into A Bar


One of the other nice features of Leo is the ability to share to a group and participate in a many-to-many, ephemeral conversation. While SnapChat Stories let you broadcast to your follower list, you get no real direct feedback from that communication. And while people can comment or respond to an Instagram post, the follower model means that not all viewers are able to participate in the conversation together.


With Leo’s implementation, anyone can create a new group and invite any of their friends. And anyone who has been invited to a group can invite someone else. So what happens if you’re invited to a group after it’s already kicked off and there’s a lively conversation going on?


Whitt says it’s kind of like if you came into a bar and started talking to a couple of your friends. You’d pick up on what they were talking about at that moment and could contribute to the conversation, but you wouldn’t know what they were talking about before you showed up.


leo group


In the same way, you can leave a group at any time — sort of like how you can just ghost at a party — but you won’t know what happens after you disappear.


I’ve been testing out Leo with a limited number of folks that I know on the app — which includes the founders and a random assortment of their friends and family, not to mention the usual early adopter set — and it seems to work well for engaging people in conversation.


Different users in a conversation might not know each other, but they can easily friend one another and begin sharing in a separate conversation. And, of course, the app allows users to block one another if they don’t want to be bothered. But blocking a person means not being able to be contacted, as well as not seeing them in any conversations that you’re both a part of.


While the group dynamic speeds up the ability to capture a moment and share it with others who you’ve already started conversations with, my one quibble is that starting a new conversation isn’t as easy as it could be. If you haven’t already started a conversation with a friend, you have to ‘start a new group’ and then pick the people who you wish to share with.


Founding Team And Backers


Leo is the brainchild of Whitt and co-founder Austin Broyles, two engineers who most recently worked together at Square. Whitt was a tech lead there, and before that was CTO at e-commerce data startup Adku, which had been acquired by Groupon. Broyles, meanwhile, worked on Square’s payments processing system and integration with Starbucks’ POS system, as well as the development of Square Cash. Before that, Broyles worked at Google, where he and Whitt overlapped for about five years but never really knew each other or worked together.


Both Whitt and Broyles left Square about four months ago and begin working on building an app together. But, surprisingly, it wasn’t this one. They spent the first six-to-eight weeks working on an app that was designed to help groups share photos and experiences with each other.


In particular, they found there was too much work for too little payoff, and besides, people only used the app every now and again when there was a big group event to engage with. So they set out to build something that was just the opposite — quick, lightweight, and would bring people back several times a day to engage with each other.


Along the way, the founders brought together a pretty decent syndicate of investors, including Battery Ventures, Freestyle Capital, Greylock Partners, Kleiner Perkins Caulfield & Byers, and SV Angel. Angel investors include Bob Lee, David King, Elad Gil, Mike Chu, Sara Haider, Steve Lee, Kent Goldman, and Raymond Tonsing. The company has raised $1.5 million to get things off the ground.


Now that it’s launched on the Apple App Store and Google Play, we’ll just have to see if it can get adoption. There’s plenty of competition out there, after all. Then again, users aren’t exactly religious about the messaging platforms that people use. And maybe, just maybe, a lightweight alternative is just what the market needs.







8:39 AM

There are a number of ephemeral messaging apps out there ( some might say too many ), all of which are trying to give their users the abilit...

Read more »
no image
appidemia

Ever since it launched five months ago, Appidemia has been on a rough ride thanks to Apple’s app policy. After weeks of exchanging emails with the review committee, the team decided to pull a plug on their most successful app because it cannot meet iOS 7 policy changes.


Appricot’s founder and CEO, Igor Salindrija said for TechCrunch that in order for the app to work, it has to be updated but the last version just couldn’t meet Apple’s rigid set of rules. Cupertino-based tech giant has turned down the app because it mimics certain aspects of the App Store. Applications that include filtering, bookmarking, searching or sharing recommendations are not considered significantly different from the App Store, therefore they cannot be approved by Apple. This forced Apppricot, the company behind the app, to make a final decision considering the future of Appidemia.


“Appidemia is a social discovery app and as such was getting a significant traction as well as positive feedback from users who preferred our solution for discovering new and useful apps. This latest and absolutely necessary update was, once again, kept on hold and then rejected which frustrated the team”, said Salindrija.


Before the final decision to shut down the app, Appidemia has managed to acquire more than 200,000 users with an almost perfect rating in the App Store. However, none of this mattered to Apple as none of the versions were approved by their app review service. Clearly disappointed, Sallindrija told TechCrunch that his team kept changing the app so much that they ended up with something completely different from their original idea.


This was never an option for Appidemia. Since shutting down, the team has shifted focus to a different project aiming to disrupt cross-platform collaboration.


“This was the only option and we hope our users can understand this”, said Salindrija.







8:38 AM

Ever since it launched five months ago , Appidemia has been on a rough ride thanks to Apple’s app policy. After weeks of exchanging emails w...

Read more »
no image
tech-apple-tv-vevo-app

Apple continues adding new channel partners to its Apple TV hardware, and now it’s rolling out four new ones today (via 9to5Mac), including Watch ABC for streaming local ABC affiliate content, Crackle for movies and TV, and KOR TV, a Korean language channel. There’s also Bloomberg, which is going to be streaming a live 24-hour news channel that provides content seven days a week.


This launch is just the most recent in what’s been an increasingly fast-paced rollout of new content partners on Apple’s set-top box, but it brings some interesting ingredients to the mix, including local broadcast TV streaming and a 24-hour news channel, which are key ingredients to what many users would consider basic TV service. Apple TV didn’t start off as a really viable cord-cutting alternative for people looking to ditch their cable subscriptions, but it’s been building up a piecemeal library of a la carte content that begins to become a truly worthy option.


It’s true that many of the services are still tied to cable service and TV packages, including the new Watch ABC channel and the HBO Go app that was launched previously, but it’s best to take all of these launches as baby steps in a larger plan that sees content unbundled from traditional sources. Apple’s Apple TV bet is a long play, and I think we’re only just starting to see the next curve around the bend on the long road to what will ultimately be a robust alternative to subscription-based bundled TV services.


Of course, that takes for granted these service providers can deliver content in a high-quality, reliable way. I’ve heard less than flattering things about the WSJ channel, which delivers live news content, but only during certain hours, unlike the Bloomberg effort. Still, the building blocks are falling into place, and Apple just needs to continue this rollout while avoiding a big blockade from legacy players along the way







8:23 AM

Apple continues adding new channel partners to its Apple TV hardware, and now it’s rolling out four new ones today (via 9to5Mac ), including...

Read more »
no image
MAG--Founders Photo

New York-based Magzter, a startup founded in 2011 to help magazine publishers get their pubs in the hands of digital readers, regardless of which platform they choose to use to read. In two years of operation, the company has managed to rack up over 900 publisher partners and put out over 2,850 issues of magazines, the company says, all powered by its proprietary web-based simple publishing tool, which pushes out editions to iOS, Google Play, Windows 8, the web and both Amazon and Huawei’s dedicated app stores all at once.


Magzter has done a good job bringing on new clients so far, and has managed to secure some high-profile U.S.-based publications recently, including from publishers like Hearst, Condé Nast, Newsweek and more. That growth, and the ongoing push for the company to become the provider of choice for a wide variety of pubs, and their localized editions, to all potential digital subscribers, is what’s behind the new $10 million round of Series B funding the company is announcing today.


“Over time, we have seen a lot of the publishers in other geographies, a lot of the licensees in different parts of the world, are using Magzter,” explained Magzter CEO Girish Ramdas in an interview. “If you go to Magzter and type in ‘Maxim,” for example, you’ll find 10 to 15 editions of Magzter from different countries, including Switzerland, South Africa, India, Singapore, etc.”


Ramdas says that making it easy for publishers to publish all their international editions and make them available on the same platform to a worldwide audience is the big opportunity for Magzter, and the funding will go to helping push that opportunity so that more and more publishers are aware they can do it cheaply and easily.


I asked Ramdas why he believes Magzter stands a chance against strong legacy players like Adobe, which makes a digital publishing suite specifically targeted at the same customer group his company focuses on. He says that it has the advantage of being priced based only on usage via revenue share agreement, rather than subscription, so Magzter gets paid only when publishers do. It’s also an open platform, which provides simple one-click publishing tools for basic digitization but also allows people to build their own interactive functionality right in using HTML5.


The investors for this round are led by Singapore Press Holdings, which is a strategic partner in that it publishes over 100 magazines in Singapore and the surrounding region, reaching a total audience of around 3 million individuals. Magzter is also working on product solutions that better automatically format content from magazines for small screen devices, so that publications can reach an audience on iPhone at the same time as they reach the iPad and tablet crowd, but with a delivery method better suited to the smaller screen.


Digital publishing is an interesting space to be in, because while publishers have enjoyed some success from Newsstand and other initiatives, these haven’t really provided the drastic turnaround required to fend off sluggish print sales. Better tools are one ingredient for attracting and keeping audiences, but magazines will probably have to dig deeper to turn things around in general.







7:39 AM

New York-based Magzter , a startup founded in 2011 to help magazine publishers get their pubs in the hands of digital readers, regardless of...

Read more »
no image
spotify

For the first time since launching, Spotify now offers free access to the streaming music service from tablets only, on iOS and Android.


Like we predicted, the company has introduced a new tier of service on mobile, allowing users to search for songs and listen on the go for free on tablets. It’s the same exact service you get on your PC for free, but migrated to a tablet.


Originally, Spotify asked users to pay $4.99 for an ad-free web experience, and $9.99 to listen across multiple devices beyond the desk top. The top tier also came with offline access.


In the new model, Spotify will allow freemium access on tablets, but shockingly not on mobile. This likely has to do with the artists and record labels who are tough to negotiate with when it comes to free access to full tracks. This was a struggle for Spotify in the beginning when the company first introduced freemium on desktop.


Out of 20 million total users, only six million of them are paying customers. But times have changed from when Spotify’s desktop-first business model was introduced.


No longer do people discover web products that translate to mobile, but rather they explore new content and services on their mobile devices and hope for an accompanying web app. Especially where music is concerned, the ability to try out Spotify on your phone when you’re already out in the world discovering new music is just the ticket to inspire folks to upgrade. Launching on tablets is the first step toward that.


Plus, free access on tablets widens the net for new, unpaid users in a world growing more and more competitive. Apple and Google have both entered the streaming music space, alongside existing competitors like Pandora, Deezer, Rdio and more are sure to follow.


Developing







7:24 AM

For the first time since launching, Spotify now offers free access to the streaming music service from tablets only, on iOS and Android. Li...

Read more »
no image
Shop_Hers

Like many women who wanted to make a little extra cash from their selling older luxury goods, Jaclyn Shanfeld had been using online consignment sites and marketplaces to sell her designer clothes and handbags she no longer wore, and quickly became frustrated with the experience. In one situation, she sent a box of designer clothing worth $4,000 to an online consignment store, only to receive $20 in return. Online consignment, she decided, needed to be disrupted. Her answer is Shop-Hers, an online marketplace for luxury goods she has co-founded with two others.


The startup, which launched last Fall, is announcing $3.5 million in funding today from a group of all-star investors. The round was led by Floodgate, with Elevation Investors, an investment entity which includes Bono and Patty Wexler; David Tisch of The Box Group, Aldo Manzini, Shana Fisher of High Line Venture Partners, Sarah Fiszel (an early VIP seller and site adopter), and Mike Hirshland of Resolute VC participating. The startup had previously raised a seed round from Fisher, Hirshland, Brian Lee, SV Angel, Jeremy Zimmer, Paige Craig and Ryan Steelberg.


At a basic level, Shop-Hers gives women the ability to buy and sell pre-owned designer merchandise within a social selling. But with Shanfeld’s ambitions of taking away the pain points of the online and in-person consignment industry (a market worth tens of billions in spending), her and her co-founders (which include the former CTO of Shoedazzle and the former creative director for Nordstrom)set out to actually use technology and community to make consignment transactions frictionless and sell these goods to a broader audience.


Here’s how it works. Sellers of designer goods can either upload their own pictures of items to the site or sign up for the VIP experience. Via the self-upload experience, sellers upload a photo of the item, and tell Shop-Hers what designer made the item. The startup actually has a list of designers to pick from, as to limit the merchandise to luxury items only. Sellers can select an asking price and designate white type of item it is (i.e. dress, tote bag, high heels). The startup will suggest pricing based upon comparable prices on other sites. But Shanfeld says that generally most merchandise is priced 50 to 60 percent less than retail price, but it’s really up to the seller to designate a price she is comfortable with.


great_catching_up__-_leenakrao_gmail.com_-_Gmail


Once the item is sold, the seller has to send the item (using a prepaid shipping label) to Shop-Hers, where the startup authenticates each item before the buyer is actually charged. This is how the startup is preventing knock-offs and fake, misrepresented items from being sold on the sites. Shop-Hers takes 18 percent of any sales from user-generated sales.


VIP sellers basically outsource all photography, shipping and can be featured more prominently on the site. These sellers, which are selling mostly high-end items, simply ship their items to Shop-Hers and designate prices. The startup will create closets for these sellers on the site, and designate pricing (but the seller has final say). For these power sellers, Shop-Hers takes 35 percent.


Shanfeld maintains these cuts and pricing is the best and most fair in the business, with the majority of the sale going back to the owner. Around 30-40 percent of seller are using the VIP service, she adds.


As mentioned above, from the buyer standpoint, all merchandise sold on the site is authenticated by the startup’s experts. And Shanfeld says that each item is carefully wrapped and presented in a clean, luxurious way so that the buyer has a luxury experience even when she opens the package. This isn’t the case with other sites like eBay, where resold clothing and accessories are packaged by the seller.


Upon signing up for Shop-Hers, buyers can also create a profile, designating their style, preferred designers, sizes and more. Shop-Hers will then create a special feed, called Style Soul Mates, which will match closets and sellers to buyers based on this data and purchase history. Other notable features include the ability to scroll over any item on the site and see an icon if the item matches your size.


Shanfeld tells us that in the future the company will be adding a mechanism by which buyers and sellers can better negotiate pricing, and a way for sellers to know whether an item has been added to a buyers cart. And the startup plans to release native mobile apps.


Within a year, Shop-Hers has quietly accumulated just under half a million users, with little to no marketing. She says sales have grown steadily month over month, and the startup recently even doubled numbers with introduction of international shipping a few months ago. Users seem to really love the experience, Shanfeld explains, because it is so personalized. In fact, as a testament to this, many users asked Shanfeld if they could invest, and she decided to take a small amount of investment from a few of her power-users. “It’s eBay meets Netaporter,” she explains.


I’m a frequent user of many of resale sites that fall into this category, including eBay and Poshmark. Other competitors out there who directly compete with Shop-Hers include The RealReal, Thredflip, and Vaunte. I actually made a purchase a few weeks ago on Shop-Hers and found the entire experience as frictionless as Shanfeld claims. The item I purchased arrived within a few days and was in the same condition as it was advertised.


You have to wonder whether eBay will eventually buy one of these sites. More than anything, the success of these marketplaces will depend on the ability to create a lasting community amongst buyers and sellers. That sense of community and human connection is what is missing in eBay. But eBay has what many of them have not yet been able to accomplish—massive scale.







7:24 AM

Like many women who wanted to make a little extra cash from their selling older luxury goods, Jaclyn Shanfeld had been using online consignm...

Read more »
no image
pubnub bitcoin

PubNub has built a business around offering APIs that let developers stream different services such as messaging and other interactive services in their apps and websites. Today it’s adding a new module that focuses specifically on Bitcoin, the cryptocurrency du jour. If you go to PubNub’s new site for the service, called the Bitcoin Exchange Solution Kit, you will see that its own demonstration of the service is being powered with data from MtGox, one of the biggest of the Bitcoin exchanges. MtGox is one of PubNub’s customers, it turns out, and its use of PubNub to power the streaming on its own homepage, along with the rise in interest in Bitcoin, are the two main forces that prompted the new solution.


Its the first big product launch from PubNub since the company announced an $11 million raise in September.


Todd Greene, PubNub’s CEO and co-founder, declined to tell me in what currency MtGox pays its PubNub bills, or any other details about the service, for that matter, including how long it has been working with MtGox. Or what size its business is for PubNub. The company has around 500 large customers (which include companies like Rebtel, Viggle, GetTaxi, Humble Bundle, StageIT, Spreecast, Celly, Monotype, Class Dojo, Coca Cola and others) Greene says, and it currently delivers real-time data to some 150 million devices per month. “That’s a bigger umber than any single Bitcoin exchange,” he said. His company at the moment does not transact in Bitcoin.


What he did do was point me to MtGox’s developer page on the service, first quietly posted about two weeks ago, which notes that it opted for PubNub “due to the difficulty to cope with the kind of volumes of data [needed] to broadcast real-time while keeping a reliable service.” The page also describes a list of public channels created on the PubNub API that can be accessed by third party developers that use Bitcoin data.


The new solution kit covers a few different areas, PubNub says:


– Real time public pricing data stream for financial streams that can be sent to “millions of devices in less than ¼ of a second without the need for any costly servers or configuration.”

– Transaction and pricing history, which encrypts private data streams.

– Secure streaming channels to users.

– Community message board features such as user detection and collaboration.

– User analytics for exchanges to track trade volume, pricing, geographical information and more over time.

– PubNub guarantees that network sockets remain open to any device “so Bitcoin pricing data and trades are delivered in under ¼ of second anywhere in the world.”


Bitcoin — a cryptocurrency whose supporters believe it offers a viable, more efficient and scalable way of paying for things than more traditional fiat currencies — has also been the subject of a lot of criticism for being a bubble currency only being pushed ahead by speculators.


Large organizations like Apple have, notably, not been very warm on it up to now, and in any mass-market consumer context, it’s still marginal. Still, prominent people who have based much of their modus operandi on making big bets on the future are bullish on bitcoin. Andreessen Horowitz recently named a new partner, Balaji Srinivasan, specifically to focus on it and other disruptive forces that touch the technology world like drones, 3d printing and genetic testing.


Regardless of whether it’s healthy growth or speculation fuelling the rush around bitcoin, it’s proving to be a very hot commodity right now. PubNub estimates that Bitcoin transactions are now exceeding 100,000 per a day, and its value now bobs above $1,000, compared to $13 only a year ago.







7:09 AM

PubNub has built a business around offering APIs that let developers stream different services such as messaging and other interactive serv...

Read more »
 
Google Analytics Alternative