Random Post

Saturday, January 4, 2014
no image

9:54 AM

This week on the TC Gadgets Podcast join the entire Away Team as we huddle around the old mic and get wacky. Next week we’ll be at CES – the...

Read more »
no image
gutenberg

When people tell me they have a book inside of them — which actually happens quite a lot, probably because I’ve been fortunate enough to have had a clutch of novels (traditionally) published — I always want to ask: “Have you considered surgery?” As George Orwell famously said: “Writing a book is a horrible, exhausting struggle, like a long bout with some painful illness. One would never undertake such a thing if one were not driven on by some demon whom one can neither resist nor understand.”


And writing is the easy part. Getting your book published can make the writing seem like two weeks on Necker Island. Or, instead of trying to survive the gauntlet which is the publishing industry, you can self-publish your work … and see it disappear, amateurishly produced and poorly edited, into the vast ocean of mediocrity that is most books. Either way, the tome in which you invested long hard months of your life will probably wind up basically unread, unloved, and irrelevant.


And yet it seems almost everybody wants to be an author someday. So I’ve been watching John Biggs’s* Mytro Project, crowdfunding a YA trilogy, with some considerable interest, not least because it actually seems to be an example of a viable third way. He is wisely spending much of the crowdfunded income on professional editing and design, meaning the end product should be as professionally produced as anything from the so-called Big Five publishers.


True, it won’t have the full force of their marketing and distribution arms behind it, but I can tell you from annoyed experience that most traditionally published books won’t get that either. (I’ve had novels published, and then largely ignored, by HarperCollins, St. Martin’s, and DC/Vertigo.) In fact, what traditional publishers really want nowadays are authors with existing “platforms,” i.e. pre-existing relationships with mass media who will publish and trumpet their work. Unfortunately for them, though, nowadays such authors — like Mr. Biggs — have a growing panoply of increasingly attractive alternatives.


The best an author can get is a traditional publisher throwing its full weight behind their book. That hasn’t changed and won’t anytime soon. But mere half-hearted support from a major publisher seems to me in many ways worse than successful crowdfunding. You do get notability, prestige, a (probably crappy) advance, a better chance at critical reviews, and handholding; but you sacrifice almost all control, for an indefinite and probably very long period.


Which is a big deal nowadays. That control gives you a lot of ways to increase your readership online. In particular, Amazon’s Kindle Direct offers a number of effective (albeit time-limited) promotional options, including making your books available for free, or making them very cheap while still claiming their 70% royalty rate. And/or you can bite the bullet and Creative-Commons-license your work for free, as I’ve done. Major publishers are, quite rationally, rarely interested in doing this; it might be good for the author in the long run, but it’s not particularly likely to be good for them.


I’m fortunate enough to have benefited from both the prestige of having been anointed by Big Publishing, and generous rights-reversion clauses. As I mused on Twitter earlier this week:





and then the very next day –



…but if those reversion clauses hadn’t been favorable, my books would essentially be dead to the world until those publishers eventually gave up on them, probably years and years hence, if ever. That’s a real risk that authors take when they go with Big Publishing.


I’ve heard it said said that the most efficient way to take advantage of getting into a really good university like MIT or Stanford is to drop out after a year; by then you’ve already amassed their prestige, which is the most valuable thing they bestow upon you. Similarly, if you already have a “platform” but you need the prestige of having been anointed by a higher power, it probably makes sense to sell a book to a legacy publisher (ideally, one of the Big Five) if you can.


But after that, if they won’t make yours a lead title, I’m really not sure it’s worth it any more. It’s best, by far, to be a major book from a big publisher; and out-and-out self-publishing remains, at best, a lottery-like crap shoot; but successful, professional crowdfunding a la Mytro seems an increasingly viable and desirable option, compared to most small presses or afterthought titles from major publishers. In the short term, the latter is better–but in the long run, it may not be worth sacrificing your rights.


Image credit: Gutenberg Bible at Huntington Library, by yours truly, on Flickr.


*Disclaimer: we both write here, but I’ve never actually met the man.







6:09 AM

When people tell me they have a book inside of them — which actually happens quite a lot, probably because I’ve been fortunate enough to hav...

Read more »
no image
One of the biggest bugbears for gamers has long been the need to use a joystick to both track a target and control the motion of their avatar or weapons, but at International CES 2014 next week, Tobii Technology will demonstrate a new solution. Tobii has teamed up with SteelSeries, the companies announced Friday, to produce what they claim will be the first mass-market eye tracking peripheral for gamers. Tobii will demo its EyeX Controller at CES as well as offering a developer kit for preorder at the show.


5:09 AM

One of the biggest bugbears for gamers has long been the need to use a joystick to both track a target and control the motion of their ava...

Read more »
Friday, January 3, 2014
no image
Here in Silicon Valley we are currently worried about a major transportation strike, and I doubt many on either side yet realize that this is likely to accelerate the move to automate most of the related jobs. There is little doubt the problem we are currently seeing here will be virtually gone in a decade, but I doubt the workers will be very happy with the solution. Often we don't anticipate the impact of a coming major technology. In fact, even companies that introduce the technology may not benefit from it in the end.


6:09 PM

Here in Silicon Valley we are currently worried about a major transportation strike, and I doubt many on either side yet realize that this...

Read more »
no image

There were plenty of media darlings at last year’s CES, but few tickled people’s fancies the way that Tactus and its amazing disappearing tablet keyboard did. The company has spent the past few months crafting reference devices for would-be partners and gearing up to help OEMs bring that impressive keyboard tech to market, but now it’s looking to supercharge those efforts with a newly raised Series B round.


Sadly, the company is keeping most of the particulars under wraps for now — Tactus didn’t disclose the size of the round or the full list of new names that are joining existing investors like Thomvest Ventures. In fact, the only new investor Tactus specifically called out is Ryoyo Electro, a sizeable Japanese OEM (that I’ve honestly never heard of) that the company originally tapped as a strategic partner late last year.


And what exactly does Tactus plan to do with a freshly minted Series B? To expand on what it’s been doing for the past year or so — working with OEMs to fine-tune the Tactus experience ahead of some big initial launches. Naturally, part of that fine-tuning comes in the form of developing different sorts of keyboard layouts for OEMs to implement since the last thing a forward-thinking device manufacturer needs is a killer feature that competitors can pick up and run with themselves.


We’ve seen the traditional keyboard layout in action before: it involves pumping up areas of the screen that correspond to your usual set of alphanumeric keys, but more exotic configurations would see the gaps between keys to bulge instead to better guide users’ fingers where they need to go.


To hear Tactus CEO Craig Ciesla tell it, the first batch of devices with those expanding keyboards should hit store shelves toward the middle of this year, and with any luck that’ll just be the beginning. After all, the company has pointed out in the past that the process of crafting traditional glass cover lenses that sit over tablet and phone displays is tricky and costly enough to make a fluid-filled Tactus layer a viable choice. When asked if Tactus’ ultimate goal was to completely supplant traditional cover lenses, Ciesla cautiously confirmed his ambitions.


“It’s not going to be a case going from Q1 2014 where everything is glass to Q1 2015 where everything is Tactus,” he noted. “This is a better interface, it’s more satisfying, it’s lighter, it won’t shatter. It’ll just take time.”


Bold words, but we’ll soon see how right he is — Tactus has promised to show off some updated models when CES starts in earnest next week, so check back to see if these guys (and their partners) can make good on their lofty promises.







5:54 PM

There were plenty of media darlings at last year’s CES, but few tickled people’s fancies the way that Tactus and its amazing disappearing t...

Read more »
no image

2:40 PM

In this week’s Ask A VC, we sat down with Revolution Ventures’ David Golden to talk about the IPO market, and his predictions for 2014. Gol...

Read more »
no image
tim mahlman

Vidible, a startup connecting buyers and sellers of video content, is confirming that it has raised a $3.35 million Series A led by Greycroft Partners.


The round was first revealed in a regulatory filing in late December, but the company is only confirming the news and sharing details now. In addition to Greycroft, IDG also participated in the new funding, according Vidible co-founder and President Tim Mahlman (pictured).


Mahlman give me a quick demo of the product. He said that the current methods of syndicating videos are “archaic,” with with very little control or transparency. For example, he said publishers looking for videos usually have to go through an unsorted Media RSS feed.


With Vidible, on the other hand, content buyers can search for different kinds of videos, or they can just include the Vidible tag on their site and relevant videos will be played automatically. The content creators, meanwhile, have control over where their videos get played, and both sides have access to analytics.


Greycroft’s John Elton argued that Vidible is taking advantage of three broad trends — the growth in video consumption, the “increasing demand from content sites for video,” and the “increasing demand from advertisers for video impressions.” When asked if he thinks we’ll see an growing number of sites choosing to syndicate videos created by others, rather than create the videos themselves, he noted that most newspaper companies (for example) didn’t create TV channels either, “So why do we think they’re going to be able to do that for online video?”


“I think it’s a new medium,” Elton added. “There are people that do it very well, that are looking for more distribution, and there are publishers looking for content that’s appropriate for their site.”


He also said that he’s impressed by Vidible’s focus on monetization. The content buyer pays a set rate based on impressions, then they can either run their own ads with the videos or run ads from one of Vidible’s network partners.


Mahlman and his co-founder/CEO Michael Hyman both have ad tech experience (Hyman’s company Oggifinogi was acquired by Collective, while Mahlman has held positions at companies like Turn and BlueLithium), and apparently they’ve been working on Vidible for the past year. Mahlman said the beta version of the product launched over the summer, with 100 video providers now signed up and more than 1 billion impressions served each month.


“We’ve been focused on R&D until now,” Mahlman said. “Now it’s a matter of building out the business arm.”


He added that Vidible is also looking to expand internationally.







2:40 PM

Vidible , a startup connecting buyers and sellers of video content, is confirming that it has raised a $3.35 million Series A led by Greycro...

Read more »
 
Google Analytics Alternative