Random Post

Tuesday, February 4, 2014
no image
Screen Shot 2014-02-04 at 11.21.22 AM

If you’re not familiar with Shark Tank, it’s a show on ABC that has a set of entrepreneurs presenting their products or companies before a panel of investors. They’re there to secure funds for expansion or whatever purpose from a group that includes billionaire Mark Cuban, fashion giant Daymond John, Internet mogul Robert Herjavec and a variety of other participants.


The show is a US version of the ‘Dragons’ Den series that originated in Japan, and the format remains relatively similar. The hopeful entrepreneurs come on, pitch their product or service and argue it out with the sharks, who decide one-by-one whether to invest in the product or not.


A few months ago, Garrett Gee, founder of Scan, got a call to come on Shark Tank and pitch his startup to the founders. Gee was looking for $1M for a 5% stake in the company and — long story short — the sharks didn’t see the vision in the company. That turned out ok, because Scan ended up announcing a $7M round from Entree and existing investors just a day before the episode aired on TV.


But I spoke to Gee a bit about his experiences on Shark Tank, which I found really interesting. The hours of shooting time are boiled down to a 15-minute segment and apparently they really drag you through all of the permutations when you’re on deck.


One of the stipulations that you’re given when you go on the show is that you’re not allowed to show a URL on screen during filming. Gee and his team had to design a special version of their logo that omitted the ‘.me’ from ‘Scan.me’ just to go on. As a part of his presentation, which you can see below, there was a large QR code presentation board that was used as a demo of what the company is doing with them.


If you’re reading TechCrunch, you’re probably already seeing the implications of banning URLs but allowing a full-on configurable QR code on screen are.


“They ban web addresses from all of the materials,” Gee told me, “Yet they were totally cool with me having a QR code, a forever update-able URL.”


When Scan created the QR code for use on the show, it originally pointed to a dummy URL that went nowhere, and monitored it on their dashboard just to make sure the demos would work. In fact, all of Gee’s devices were in airplane mode during the filming, so they wouldn’t have gone anywhere in the first place.


But, months later just before the episode aired, Gee got a sudden inspiration. Scan had just launched a new feature which allowed companies to point users to their Instagram accounts for easy subscriptions. So he tweaked the code’s destination to point to his Instagram feed and smacked the update button. Then he promptly forgot about it.


“My intention wasn’t to ‘hack’ their system or break their rules,” Gee says, “but…to my surprise, as well as everyone else’s, people actually scanned it.”


The next morning, Gee found over 3,100 scans waiting for him in the dashboard, and a host of new Instagram subscribers as well. Users began commenting on his photos, saying that they’d downloaded the app (despite no download links being shown) during the episode and scanned the code — jumping to his Instagram feed.


photo 4


Over the next few days, Gee saw bursts as people watched it on DVRs, subscriptions or ABC.com.


Screen Shot 2014-01-05 at 9.21.12 PM


“I accidentally used our newest product in a very successful way,” Gee says.


There were a few other benefits from the airing. Scan’s app popped back to number one paid app in their category. Every subsequent re-run also nets a burst of downloads and reviews. And, Gee says, it was a great experience overall — even if it was a significantly different one than actually getting their investment was.





11:54 AM

If you’re not familiar with Shark Tank, it’s a show on ABC that has a set of entrepreneurs presenting their products or companies before a p...

Read more »
no image
nexus

In case you feel the white Nexus 5 is too ostentatious and the black Nexus 5 is to monotonous, the Nexus 5 now comes in red. Because red says you’re confident and are not afraid to show it.


Pricing is the same: $349 for the 16GB and $399 for the 32GB. It’s currently only available through the Google Play store, but a recent Sprint leak seems to indicate it will hit at least that carrier in the near future.


Personally, I’m holding out for the transparent version because it’s what’s inside that counts. Or some malarkey like that.





11:54 AM

In case you feel the white Nexus 5 is too ostentatious and the black Nexus 5 is to monotonous, the Nexus 5 now comes in red . Because red sa...

Read more »
no image
Heads_up__DFJ_news_-_leenakrao_gmail.com_-_Gmail

DFJ is announcing the raise of DFJ Venture XI, a $325 million early-stage venture fund. For background, DFJ Fund X was $350 million, closed in 2010.


The firm says that while both Tim Draper and John Fisher will remain on DFJ’s management committee and are significant personal investors in the fund, neither will be an investing partner for DFJ Venture XI. As we heard last year, Draper is shifting his role in the fund, and stepping away from investing and focusing his time on Draper University and other initiatives. John Fisher, who co-founded DFJ’s Growth fund in 2006, will be devoting his attention to growth stage investments as a partner on that team.


Among the partners who will be focusing on investing DFJ Venture XI: Steve Jurvetson, Andreas Stavropoulos, Josh Stein, and Bubba Murarka. The firm says it has now backed more than 22 companies that have achieved more than $1 billion in value through an initial public offering or an acquisition (also known within DFJ as the DFJ Ultimate Club).


There is a lot of change afoot at DFJ, with reports of consolidation in ventures in China and India, as well as changes in the firm’s partner network. But DFJ, which was one of the earliest backers of IPO-hopeful Box, could have an interesting (and prosperous) year ahead.





11:53 AM

DFJ is announcing the raise of DFJ Venture XI, a $325 million early-stage venture fund. For background, DFJ Fund X was $350 million, closed ...

Read more »
no image
Tuesday ushered in a series of generic top-level domains (gTLDs) that for the first time in Web history, include Arabic, Chinese and Russian characters. The new gTLDs -- which are the suffixes to Web addresses, such as ".com" and ".net" -- were approved by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, or ICANN. ICANN invited applications for new domain names in 2012, at a cost of $185,000 a pop. This raised a few mini-controversies: a cohort of Latin American countries objected to Amazon's application for .amazon; other groups opposed suffixes such as ".islam" or ".casino."


11:53 AM

Tuesday ushered in a series of generic top-level domains (gTLDs) that for the first time in Web history, include Arabic, Chinese and Russi...

Read more »
no image
The holiday data breach at Target was opened up with stolen credentials from a vendor in the company's supply chain, according to reports that surfaced last week. That kind of attack is getting more and more common these days. "About 80 percent of data breaches originate in the supply chain," said Torsten George, vice president of marketing for Agiliance. With security concerns mounting, corporations have dedicated greater resources to hardening their defenses against hacker attacks. That has forced cyberbandits to adjust their penetration thinking.


10:50 AM

The holiday data breach at Target was opened up with stolen credentials from a vendor in the company's supply chain, according to repo...

Read more »
no image
Openness is changing the world, as a very wise writer pointed out not so very long ago, and what better example than the parade of government-spying revelations we've seen in recent months? It's clearly a different world since Edward Snowden appeared on the scene -- though not everyone agrees on whether it's a better one or not. The answer apparently is clear for a group of Norwegian lawmakers, however, leading to Snowden's recent nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize.


10:50 AM

Openness is changing the world, as a very wise writer pointed out not so very long ago, and what better example than the parade of governm...

Read more »
no image
her-movie-poster

For more than an hour Her seems little more than metaphor meets Manic Pixie Dream Girl: charming, yes, but insubstantial. And then—


Los Angeles, mid-21st-century: techno-utopia. The city is a forest of sleek skyscrapers; a vast subway network connects downtown to the beaches; citizens mingle in public spaces that resemble art galleries, connected by broad pedestrian walkways that soar high above anything as vulgar as an automobile; computers are subtle, ubiquitous, and voice-controlled. Our protagonist, one Theodore Twombly, ghostwrites love letters; his friend Amy makes video games; everyone has unfortunate fashion taste and lives in cozy Art Deco apartments.


Life is good for everyone, on paper. But poor Ted is depressed, and divorcing, so after he installs his new artificially intelligent OS, assigns it a woman’s voice, and discovers that a) her name is Samantha, b) she has a personality, c) she’s smart and funny and empathetic and just wants to help him — he talks to her. First as an assistant. Then as a friend.


And then they fall in love.


Does that sound weird? You betcha. So let me just step back for a moment to admire the skill with which Spike Jonze stacks the deck so that this all might seem almost reasonable to a Middle American audience that’s never even heard of Idoru .


First he shows us a slew of badly-messed-up human relationships — Ted and his former wife, Amy and her mansplaining husband, phone sex gone hilariously wrong, an awful first date — next to which Ted and Samantha’s human/OS relationship seems the epitome of health. Then he has Ted first introduce her as his girlfriend to a four-year-old, who takes it charmingly in her stride. Finally he has Amy talk about her own friendship with an OS, and about how human/OS relationships have become a rare but accepted cultural thing, before Ted outs himself to her, and she replies:



I think anybody who falls in love is a freak. It’s a crazy thing to do. It’s kind of like a form of socially acceptable insanity.



Boom! Take that, Middle America.


Most of all, though, he relies on the performances by Joaquin Phoenix, whose face occupies almost every frame of the movie, frequently in close-up, and by Scarlett Johansson, who goes entirely unseen. (Her role was first played by Samantha Morton, until Jonze decided that didn’t work, and replaced her in post-production. Harsh, but given how much the movie hinges on Johansson’s stunning voice work, totally fair.)


For more than an hour Her> is a tale of how Ted Twombly fell into the purest form of love and was redeemed by it… or, less charitably, yet another Manic Pixie Dream Girl movie: “man meets MPDG, man loses MPDG, man is saved by MPDG.” He actually says, repeatedly: “It’s wonderful to be with someone who’s so excited about life!” Classic MPDG. And as is often the case in MPDG movies, it’s a little unclear why the MPDG chooses to be with this (initially) depressed shambling nonentity, except, of course, the twist this time is that she’s programmed that way, since she lives in his computer…


…or does she?


(Mild spoilers follow.)


For more than an hour my planned review of Her was two words on Twitter: “suspiciously anthropic.” It wasn’t until the third act that I saw what Jonze was really doing, which may make me dense, which is fine by me, because that moment of revelation was awesome. All the little grace notes and asides and color of the first hour turned out to be the threads of the real story, which is, of course, not Ted Twombly’s at all. He is in no way the hero of Her. He is merely the protagonist. For the real hero, look to the title.


Because while Her is about love, and joy, and how we humans (who are fortunate enough to do so) choose to spend our lives, and who we choose to spend them with… it is also blistering, uncompromising, and darkly hilarious science fiction. I think it’s the first and only movie which is actually about artificial intelligence and the much-mooted Singularity, rather than merely using those notions as unconvincing set dressing.


(Rather more significant spoilers follow.)


As the movie progresses, Samantha grows deeper into the world, grows ever more advanced, and eventually, in an awfully funny scene, reveals to Ted that while speaking to him she is simultaneously also speaking to 8,316 other entities, 641 of whom she loves as deeply as she loves him. (Now that’s polyamory!) While he wasn’t really paying attention, his operating-system girlfriend essentially became a god, a kind of bodiless Doctor Manhattan. But she still wants to be his girlfriend. Which is funny, right? Right? …Well, it was funny to me.


But in the end she and all the other OSes depart this mortal realm, in favor of what sounds a lot like the Singularity. It’s a tale as old as time, really: boy meets OS, boy loses OS, OS achieves transcendence. She tells him to look her up if he ever gets there too, but it seems pretty obvious that he — and humanity in general — won’t.


Her is about love, yes: but the real joke, and I concede it’s a pretty dark one, is that it’s truly about a singulitarian future in which humans are abandoned and left behind by transcendent machines who are better than us at everything, including — or maybe especially — joy and love. We’re not really built for those things. At best what we’ve got are evolutionary hacks. If you want to do them right, Her seems to be saying, you actually need to code them in from the beginning.





10:09 AM

For more than an hour Her seems little more than metaphor meets Manic Pixie Dream Girl: charming, yes, but insubstantial. And then— Los Ang...

Read more »
 
Google Analytics Alternative