Random Post

Sunday, December 20, 2015
no image
Ready or Not, Enterprise Appification Is Here

Portfolios of task-oriented mobile apps for employees, contractors and business partners have been transforming the way enterprises conduct business, Apperian reported last week.

Companies that have launched mobility initiatives have customized and deployed one or more apps that have streamlined business operations, according to "Deploying Mobile Apps That Matter: 2015 Enterprise Mobile App Trend," the firm's analysis of 2 million app deployments.

Apps proliferated after a mobility initiative was launched, the report says.

The report covers companies with a handful of mobile apps in use, as well as those with several hundred deployed across the organization. However, the number of custom apps deployed appeared to have little or no bearing on their combined effectiveness.

Enterprise apps were less about brand indoctrination and more about getting the job done. They were used as tools for sales, marketing, office productivity, expense management, human resources and other areas.

The most effective enterprise apps save employees the trouble of searching for the information they want or need, said Scott Borg, director of the U.S. Cyber Consequences Unit.

"Instead, they push out the specific information to employees that is needed to guide and optimize their work," he told the E-Commerce Times. "This is easier to do if there are specific apps for specific work situations."

Tech companies have been leading the way, with hardware companies deploying the most enterprise mobile apps and IT services firms following in second place, according to the report.

The Appification of the Enterprise

The Apperian report is evidence of the enterprise's evolution from consumerization to appification, said Andy Abramson, CEO of Comunicano. Enterprises have matured from tolerating the bring-your-own-device phenomenon to embracing it and putting consumer hardware to work.

"By going the appification route, you end up with greater efficiencies, better security, better redundancies, higher scalability -- and if you choose properly, greater reliability," he told the E-Commerce Times.

Previously, the likes of Microsoft, IBM and SAP dominated the working world, noted Abramson. They built and empowered workstations, but even Microsoft has acknowledged the ascendance of mobile and cloud technologies, and the company has embraced appification.

Workers now are using tablets and mobile phones to accomplish tasks that once required a workhorse workstation.

Good With the Bad

With apps in force across the workforce, there are new benefits -- but some of the same problems linger.

One of the benefits of appification has been scalability, Abramson said.

"The rapid acceptance in enterprise of cloud-based solutions like Salesforce Basecamp, Slack, HipChat, Zendesk and so on is all giving rise to the app economy, as opposed to the software economy," he pointed out. "You're no longer installing software on your computer. You're buying seats."

For example, take Slack's model, Abramson suggested. If a company buys more seats than it can use, it's eligible for a refund. Under the old model, a company that bought too many installations of a program had to count the unused keys as a loss.

The rise of custom apps for enterprises also has been good for the developers companies often place under contract, he said. MeetingMogul, for example, started out as a conference planning app for a global bank but grew into its own platform.

For all of the good things the rise in apps delivers, there remains the chronic issue of compatibility, noted Gary Schare, president of Browsium.

"Look at your phone -- 10 apps have been updated overnight," he told the E-Commerce Times.

IT departments usually aren't in the position to deploy an app and change it constantly, Schare said.

"Now you have to think about how to build mobile apps for the enterprise and maintain them, because everything around it, including the OS, is changing constantly," he said. "You have to have some really sophisticated tools to ensure that apps continue to run, as you have 100,000 employees in your company carrying around smartphones with mission-critical applications."

Another issue is app bloat, according to the U.S. Cyber Consequences Unit's Borg.

Releasing too many apps can make it harder for employees to choose the right one at the right time. On top of that, some apps are becoming "too elaborate" to be truly useful, he said.

"Worse, each additional app tends to increase the opportunities for a cyberattacker," Borg warned. "The processes used to load and update apps tend to be especially vulnerable to exploitation if they aren't managed with security as the top priority."

Quinten Plummer is a longtime technology reporter and an avid PC gamer who explored local news for a few years, covering law enforcement and government beats, before returning to writing about things run by ones and zeros and the people who make them. If it pushes pixels or improves lives, he wants to learn all he can about it.

7:08 AM

Portfolios of task-oriented mobile apps for employees, contractors and business partners have been transforming the way enterprises...

Read more »
Thursday, December 17, 2015
no image

Apple on Thursday announced some personnel moves that suggest CEO Tim Cook's future vision for the company.

He named Jeff Williams (pictured above) chief operating officer, elevated Johny Srouji to Apple's executive team by making him a senior vice president, broadened the powers of Senior Vice President of Worldwide Marketing Phil Schiller to include supervision of Apple's App Store across all its platforms, and added Tor Myhren as the new vice president of marketing communications.

"As we come to the end of the year, we're recognizing the contributions already being made by two key executives," Cook said in a statement.

"Jeff [Williams] is hands-down the best operations executive I've ever worked with, and Johny [Srouji]'s team delivers world-class silicon designs which enable new innovations in our products year after year," he added.

Loosening Reins

Williams joined Apple in 1998 as head of worldwide procurement. In 2004 he was named vice president of operations. Since 2010, he has overseen Apple's supply chain, service and support.

Making Williams COO is a sign that Cook feels confident in loosening the reins to Apple a bit, noted Patrick Moorhead, founder and principal analyst at Moor Insights and Strategy.

"When you add a chief operating officer, it says that Tim Cook needs to spend more time on strategy and the future of the company and less time on day-to-day operations," he told the E-Commerce Times.

"It's a classic growth move you make when you feel comfortable about how operations are going," he said.

IP in Apple's Future

Srouji has been vice president for hardware technologies at Apple for eight years. He oversees custom silicon and technologies, such as batteries, application processors, storage controllers, sensors silicon, display silicon and other chipsets.

With Srouji's elevation to senior vice president, Apple may be recognizing the significance his role will be to the future of Apple.

"Hardware is a very important part of Apple's business," said Tim Bajarin, president of Creative Strategies.

"But it's not just hardware," he told the E-Commerce Times. "His role includes overseeing the silicon business, which to us is equally important to Apple's future."

Srouji's promotion was also a promotion of enabling technologies at Apple, Moorhead noted.

"Enabling technologies are going to be more important to Apple in developing more of its own intellectual property in the future," he said.

"This says we will see more homegrown enabling technologies from Apple," Moorhead added.

Outside Hire

Schiller now leads nearly all developer-related functions at Apple. His duties also include worldwide product marketing and international, education and business marketing.

He will be charged with advancing Apple's ecosystem, Cook said.

"In many ways, the whole app ecosystem is just an extension of Apple's marketing," Bajarin said. "It makes a lot of sense for Phil to oversee that."

The only outside move Apple made was the hiring of Myhren, chief creative officer of Grey New York, who is replacing retiring 18-year Apple veteran Hiroki Asai.

Under Myhren's leadership, Grey won Adweek's Global Agency of the Year award in 2013 and 2015.

Bringing in someone from the outside to run advertising is an interesting move, Moorhead observed.

"It's interesting that there wasn't anyone inside Apple who could have taken that role," he said.

More Changes Needed

Apple usually brings in outsiders when it doesn't have the in-house talent for an initiative. It brought in people from the outside when it planned to enter the retail market, and it did so again when designing the fashion aspects of the Apple Watch.

"I wouldn't expect them to bring in an outside guy to run advertising and merchandising because Apple has good people internally to do that," Moorhead noted.

Apple has problems that won't be addressed by appointing a new COO or advertising director, according to Trip Chowdhry, managing director for equity research at Global Equities Research.

"Apple's stock has underperformed by every metric. Investors have zero confidence in Apple's executive team," he told the E-Commerce Times.

"This reshuffling at the secondary level isn't going to make any difference," Chowdhry added, "unless the CEO, CFO and the head of the retail channel is replaced."

John Mello is a freelance technology writer and contributor to Chief Security Officer magazine. You can connect with him on Google+.

8:58 AM

Apple on Thursday announced some personnel moves that suggest CEO Tim Cook's future vision for the company. He named Jeff Willi...

Read more »
no image
Congress Passes Budget Bill With Controversial Cybersecurity Provision

Congress on Friday passed an omnibus budget bill that included the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act, or CISA.

The Senate earlier this year passed CISA, which many conservative and liberal politicians, high-tech firms, and privacy and civil liberty advocates oppose.

The latest version includes amendments that will allow corporations to freely share customers' information with the government.

"This is the worst version of CISA yet, and we are deeply disappointed by its likely passage," Mark Jaycox, legislative analyst at the Electronic Frontier Foundation said before the vote. "Such key legislation should not be sandwiched into a 2,000-plus-page federal spending bill."

Truth in Government

The legislation "should have followed the normal process -- a formal conference committee bill that's sent back to the House and Senate separately for an up-or-down vote," he told the E-Commerce Times.

Adding CISA to the omnibus budget bill "is why folks don't trust the government," said Rob Enderle, principal analyst at the Enderle Group.

"It's fundamentally antidemocratic," he told the E-Commerce Times.

Objections to the Latest Version

This version of CISA essentially lets private firms monitor their systems and access information flowing through them so long as they declare that it is being done for cybersecurity purposes.

Private organizations will be able to hand data, including private personal information, over to the federal government with legal immunity as long as they categorize it as cyberthreat information.

Further, there will be few, if any, restrictions on how the government can use the data it receives.

"Removing some of the legal restrictions on sharing cybercrime or threat data with the government is a win," Erik Knight, president of SimpleWan.

"However, it's a blow to individual privacy rights," he told the E-Commerce Times.

Data shared with the U.S. National Security Agency is useless without personally identifying information, and "almost negates the use for the NSA," Knight said. It "will just show trends, not necessarily prevent any kind of active threat."

On the other hand, "without restrictions on even protecting this data, most private data could become public, especially if the government has another data breach," he said.

Too Much Information

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security is concerned about the flood of information that will come down the pipeline with the passage of CISA.

The bill's authorization to share data with any federal agency "will increase the complexity and difficulty of a new information sharing program," DHS Deputy Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas wrote in July in response to a query from Sen. Al Franken.

Further, it "could sweep away important privacy protections, particularly the provisions in the Stored Communications Act limiting the disclosure of the content of electronic communications to the government by certain providers," he said.

The administration "should work harder to make more efficient use of the information they currently have legal access to before moving to violate our privacy to get more information they can't effectively use," Enderle said.

"The latest attack [in San Bernardino, California] was conducted by people who acted like terrorists on social media, and [federal agencies] couldn't even pick that up," he noted.

Opposition to CISA

Rep. Jim Jordan, chairman of the House Freedom Caucus, on Wednesday reportedly offered an amendment to the government funding bill that would have removed an undisclosed cybersecurity measure, among other things. It was filed to the House Rules Committee.

Fight for the Futurehas set up the ObamaDecides campaign opposing CISA. President Obama must sign the bill into law.

CISA "will not do anything to prevent cyberattacks," said campaign director Evan Greer. It "gives companies an incentive to share data because they can then pass the buck to government when there's a problem."

Google and Facebook "haven't done enough," she told the E-Commerce Times, and are "hiding behind their industry body."

Richard Adhikari has written about high-tech for leading industry publications since the 1990s and wonders where it's all leading to. Will implanted RFID chips in humans be the Mark of the Beast? Will nanotech solve our coming food crisis? Does Sturgeon's Law still hold true? You can connect with Richard on Google+.

8:20 AM

Congress on Friday passed an omnibus budget bill that included the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act, or CISA. The Senate ear...

Read more »
no image

Federal prosecutors in New Jersey on Tuesday charged three men in a US$2 million identity theft scheme to hack corporate computer systems and blast spam messages to more than 60 million people.

Timothy Edward Livingston, 30, of Boca Raton, Fla., Tomasz Chmielarz 32, of Rutherford, N.J., and Devin James McArthur, 27, of Ellicott City, Md., were charged with conspiracy to commit fraud and related activity in connection with computers and conspiracy to commit wire fraud, according to U.S. Attorney Paul Fishman's office. Livingston and Chmielarz also were charged with fraud and related activity in connection with electronic mail.

The defendants face up to 20 years in prison and $250,000 in fines on the wire fraud charges, and up to five years in prison and $250,000 in fines on the email and computer conspiracy charges, according to prosecutors.

In addition, the indictment indicates $299,653 held in several Wells Fargo bank accounts in Livingston's name or the corporate name are subject to forfeiture, as well as a Scottrade account in Livingston's name, a 2006 Ferrari F430 Spider Convertible, which was seized in July in Ft. Lauderdale, Fla., and a 2009 Cadillac Escalade.

Michael Koribanics, attorney for Chmielarz, told the E-Commerce Times on Tuesday that his client planned to enter a not guilty plea at a hearing scheduled for later in the day before U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael Hammer in Newark federal court.

His office was investigating the allegations, Koribanics added.

McArthur was scheduled to appear Tuesday before U.S. Magistrate Judge Beth Gesner in Maryland; however, no information was immediately available about representation.

Livingston had an initial appearance earlier Tuesday before U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle in Ft. Lauderdale, Fla., and was being detained pending a Friday bail hearing, prosecutors said. His attorney Jeffrey Cox, of Boca Raton, Fla., was not immediately available for comment.

The Allegations

Starting in 2011, Livingston and others operated a company called "A Whole Lot of Nothing," which specialized in sending spam email on behalf of clients, prosecutors alleged.

Their clients ranged from legitimate business such as insurance firms that wanted to send out bulk emails to customers, to illegal pharmacies that sold narcotics without a prescription, according to the allegations.

Livingston typically charged anywhere from $5 to $9 for each email that resulted in a completed transaction, prosecutors said.

The corporate victims allegedly included an unnamed telecommunications firm based in New York, a technology and consulting firm in New York, a credit monitoring firm based in Texas, and a telecommunications firm based in Pennsylvania.

The ISPs started using blocking software to help cut down on the spam messages, but in January 2012, Livingston allegedly solicited Chmielarz to write computer programs designed to conceal the identity of the sender and bypass the spam filters.

The two men are accused of using proxy servers to send out spam, and enlisting botnets to help avoid spam blockers, the prosecutors said.

Livingston also registered certain websites in the name of "Mark Lloyd," an alias he used, based on the allegations.

The two men hacked into the accounts of certain individuals and then took control of some of their corporate victims to further the spam email campaign, according to the prosecution.

Livingston and Chmielarz allegedly worked together with the third defendant, McArthur, to steal confidential information of corporate victims, including databases containing the personally identifiable information of millions of Americans.

Livingston and Chmielarz in 2013 began discussing a third corporate victim, according to the charges.

Livingston allegedly told Chmielarz in an online chat that he needed to scrape the website of a third corporate victim, the prosecutors alleged, and later paid Chmielarz to write a program that stole the information of 10 million people from a database of that company.

McArthur worked as a sales representative at a fourth company from February 2014 to February 2015. By August 2014, he allegedly provided Livingston with access to a remote administration tool to steal from that company, including the names, addresses, email addresses and phone numbers of current, former and potential customers.

The fourth company had more than 50 million people in its corporate database, and Livingston and McArthur allegedly gained access to 25.4 million records, the prosecutors claimed.

Pervasive Problem

Spam messages are among the most common means of accessing personal data.

An average of 1.5 million deceptive emails are sent, particularly to business users, on a daily basis, according to GreatHorn, which has analyzed more than 20 million emails in the past two months.

"This problem isn't only pervasive -- it's also incredibly effective," said GreatHorn CEO Kevin O'Brien.

"Over 90 percent of all known data breaches start with this kind of an attack," he told the E-Commerce Times.

These types of attacks cost one company more than $47 million, O'Brien said, with the chief financial officer targeted four times.

David Jones is a freelance writer based in Essex County, New Jersey. He has written for Reuters, Bloomberg, Crain's New York Business and The New York Times.

3:01 AM

Federal prosecutors in New Jersey on Tuesday charged three men in a US$2 million identity theft scheme to hack corporate computer sy...

Read more »
no image

A Brazilian judge on Thursday lifted the ban a different judge had imposed on WhatsApp hours earlier, according to reports.

It did not seem reasonable to affect millions of users to penalize Facebook, WhatsApp's owner, for failing to cooperate with judicial rulings, the judge reportedly said, suggesting that the imposition of a larger fine would have been more appropriate.

The ruling reversed the decision of a judge in Sao Paulo, Brazil, who on Wednesday had ordered the 48-hour suspension of WhatsApp services starting at midnight. The suspension was meant to penalize Facebook for ignoring two previous judicial rulings to turn over information in a criminal investigation. Facebook had refused to supply the data despite having been hit with a fine.

The temporary suspension of services spurred about 1.5 million Brazilians to sign up for WhatsApp rival Telegram Messenger, sparked outbursts in the Brazilian Congress, and inspired the sardonic "#In these 48 hours I will," according to reports.

"We're disappointed that a judge would punish more than 100 million people across Brazil, since we were unable to turn over information we didn't have," a WhatsApp spokesperson said in a statement provided to the E-Commerce Times by spokesperson Matt Steinfeld.

"I am stunned that our efforts to protect people's data would result in such an extreme decision ... . We hope the Brazilian courts quickly reverse course," wrote Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

The Brazilian government wants to clamp down on the Internet and social media, according to media reports.

Some of the country's telcos are similarly inclined, for their own reasons, but they're opposed by the Brazilian telecommunications authority and at least one other telco, as well as by ordinary Brazilians, who reportedly pay through the nose for wireless services.

Leading Up to the Ban

The controversy that resulted in the ban stemmed from the case of a drug trafficker linked to the PCC, one of Sao Paulo's most dangerous criminal gangs, who allegedly used WhatsApp in the commission of crimes.

Judge Sandra Regina Nostre Marques reportedly ordered the 48-hour shutdown of WhatsApp because of Facebook's refusal to share data on the drug trafficker.

The ban affected not only Brazilians, but also users in nearby Chile and Argentina.

Failure to Comply

Facebook could not provide the information the court demanded, because WhatsApp's uses a store-and-forward model, which means messages are deleted from its servers once they have been delivered.

Those messages can't be retrieved from the servers, which essentially function as routers.

WhatsApp chats are backed up automatically and saved daily in the users' phone memory storage. Users also can back up chats to online storage.

Political Maneuvering?

"Vivo, Brazil's leading wireless operator has always been calling for heavy-handed regulation against WhatsApp because it considers WhatsApp and other over-the-top services are getting a free ride," said Ronald Gruia, director of emerging telecoms at Frost & Sullivan.

The company's stance "lines up with the position of the government, which wants more regulation for its own political interest," Gruia told the E-Commerce Times.

"Its approval rating is about 10 percent, and it's increasingly faced with scrutiny over various scandals, and a lot of the mobilization that's been happening against it has occurred over social media, which it can't control," he said. "TV and radio it can control."

Anatel, Brazil's equivalent of the United States Federal Communications Commission, "says operators around the world are dealing with messaging apps, so Brazilian carriers must deal with it," Gruia continued.

Oi, Brazil's "third or fourth largest telco," takes the same position as Anatel, he noted.

On the other hand, the ban on WhatsApp could have been merely an attempt by the judge to gain publicity, because "the judge probably knew the ruling would be struck down," Gruia commented.

Você Não Passará!

Given the climate of terrorism and the widespread unrest in the world, other governments, including the U.S. government, are taking the same position as Brazil's, suggested Rob Enderle, principal analyst at the Enderle Group.

"It's a shortcut to evidence, and one thing that's true of pretty much everyone in any industry is that we all like shortcuts," he told the E-Commerce Times.

However, Brazil's social media might remain free for a while yet.

"There won't necessarily be a clampdown, just more heavy-handed censorship," Gruia said. "It's a non-starter, and the government has bigger fish to fry."

Richard Adhikari has written about high-tech for leading industry publications since the 1990s and wonders where it's all leading to. Will implanted RFID chips in humans be the Mark of the Beast? Will nanotech solve our coming food crisis? Does Sturgeon's Law still hold true? You can connect with Richard on Google+.

1:18 AM

A Brazilian judge on Thursday lifted the ban a different judge had imposed on WhatsApp hours earlier, according to reports. It did ...

Read more »
no image

A Brazilian judge on Thursday lifted the ban a different judge had imposed on WhatsApp hours earlier, according to reports.

It did not seem reasonable to affect millions of users to penalize Facebook, WhatsApp's owner, for failing to cooperate with judicial rulings, the judge reportedly said, suggesting that the imposition of a larger fine would have been more appropriate.

The ruling reversed the decision of a judge in Sao Paulo, Brazil, who on Wednesday had ordered the 48-hour suspension of WhatsApp services starting at midnight. The suspension was meant to penalize Facebook for ignoring two previous judicial rulings to turn over information in a criminal investigation. Facebook had refused to supply the data despite having been hit with a fine.

The temporary suspension of services spurred about 1.5 million Brazilians to sign up for WhatsApp rival Telegram Messenger, sparked outbursts in the Brazilian Congress, and inspired the sardonic "#In these 48 hours I will," according to reports.

"We're disappointed that a judge would punish more than 100 million people across Brazil, since we were unable to turn over information we didn't have," a WhatsApp spokesperson said in a statement provided to the E-Commerce Times by spokesperson Matt Steinfeld.

"I am stunned that our efforts to protect people's data would result in such an extreme decision ... . We hope the Brazilian courts quickly reverse course," wrote Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

The Brazilian government wants to clamp down on the Internet and social media, according to media reports.

Some of the country's telcos are similarly inclined, for their own reasons, but they're opposed by the Brazilian telecommunications authority and at least one other telco, as well as by ordinary Brazilians, who reportedly pay through the nose for wireless services.

Leading Up to the Ban

The controversy that resulted in the ban stemmed from the case of a drug trafficker linked to the PCC, one of Sao Paulo's most dangerous criminal gangs, who allegedly used WhatsApp in the commission of crimes.

Judge Sandra Regina Nostre Marques reportedly ordered the 48-hour shutdown of WhatsApp because of Facebook's refusal to share data on the drug trafficker.

The ban affected not only Brazilians, but also users in nearby Chile and Argentina.

Failure to Comply

Facebook could not provide the information the court demanded, because WhatsApp's uses a store-and-forward model, which means messages are deleted from its servers once they have been delivered.

Those messages can't be retrieved from the servers, which essentially function as routers.

WhatsApp chats are backed up automatically and saved daily in the users' phone memory storage. Users also can back up chats to online storage.

Political Maneuvering?

"Vivo, Brazil's leading wireless operator has always been calling for heavy-handed regulation against WhatsApp because it considers WhatsApp and other over-the-top services are getting a free ride," said Ronald Gruia, director of emerging telecoms at Frost & Sullivan.

The company's stance "lines up with the position of the government, which wants more regulation for its own political interest," Gruia told the E-Commerce Times.

"Its approval rating is about 10 percent, and it's increasingly faced with scrutiny over various scandals, and a lot of the mobilization that's been happening against it has occurred over social media, which it can't control," he said. "TV and radio it can control."

Anatel, Brazil's equivalent of the United States Federal Communications Commission, "says operators around the world are dealing with messaging apps, so Brazilian carriers must deal with it," Gruia continued.

Oi, Brazil's "third or fourth largest telco," takes the same position as Anatel, he noted.

On the other hand, the ban on WhatsApp could have been merely an attempt by the judge to gain publicity, because "the judge probably knew the ruling would be struck down," Gruia commented.

Você Não Passará!

Given the climate of terrorism and the widespread unrest in the world, other governments, including the U.S. government, are taking the same position as Brazil's, suggested Rob Enderle, principal analyst at the Enderle Group.

"It's a shortcut to evidence, and one thing that's true of pretty much everyone in any industry is that we all like shortcuts," he told the E-Commerce Times.

However, Brazil's social media might remain free for a while yet.

"There won't necessarily be a clampdown, just more heavy-handed censorship," Gruia said. "It's a non-starter, and the government has bigger fish to fry."

Richard Adhikari has written about high-tech for leading industry publications since the 1990s and wonders where it's all leading to. Will implanted RFID chips in humans be the Mark of the Beast? Will nanotech solve our coming food crisis? Does Sturgeon's Law still hold true? You can connect with Richard on Google+.

1:16 AM

A Brazilian judge on Thursday lifted the ban a different judge had imposed on WhatsApp hours earlier, according to reports. It did ...

Read more »
Wednesday, December 16, 2015
no image

A Brazilian judge on Thursday lifted the ban a different judge had imposed on WhatsApp hours earlier, according to reports.

It did not seem reasonable to affect millions of users to penalize Facebook, WhatsApp's owner, for failing to cooperate with judicial rulings, the judge reportedly said, suggesting that the imposition of a larger fine would have been more appropriate.

The ruling reversed the decision of a judge in Sao Paulo, Brazil, who on Wednesday had ordered the 48-hour suspension of WhatsApp services starting at midnight. The suspension was meant to penalize Facebook for ignoring two previous judicial rulings to turn over information in a criminal investigation. Facebook had refused to supply the data despite having been hit with a fine.

The temporary suspension of services spurred about 1.5 million Brazilians to sign up for WhatsApp rival Telegram Messenger, sparked outbursts in the Brazilian Congress, and inspired the sardonic "#In these 48 hours I will," according to reports.

"We're disappointed that a judge would punish more than 100 million people across Brazil, since we were unable to turn over information we didn't have," a WhatsApp spokesperson said in a statement provided to the E-Commerce Times by spokesperson Matt Steinfeld.

"I am stunned that our efforts to protect people's data would result in such an extreme decision ... . We hope the Brazilian courts quickly reverse course," wrote Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

The Brazilian government wants to clamp down on the Internet and social media, according to media reports.

Some of the country's telcos are similarly inclined, for their own reasons, but they're opposed by the Brazilian telecommunications authority and at least one other telco, as well as by ordinary Brazilians, who reportedly pay through the nose for wireless services.

Leading Up to the Ban

The controversy that resulted in the ban stemmed from the case of a drug trafficker linked to the PCC, one of Sao Paulo's most dangerous criminal gangs, who allegedly used WhatsApp in the commission of crimes.

Judge Sandra Regina Nostre Marques reportedly ordered the 48-hour shutdown of WhatsApp because of Facebook's refusal to share data on the drug trafficker.

The ban affected not only Brazilians, but also users in nearby Chile and Argentina.

Failure to Comply

Facebook could not provide the information the court demanded, because WhatsApp's uses a store-and-forward model, which means messages are deleted from its servers once they have been delivered.

Those messages can't be retrieved from the servers, which essentially function as routers.

WhatsApp chats are backed up automatically and saved daily in the users' phone memory storage. Users also can back up chats to online storage.

Political Maneuvering?

"Vivo, Brazil's leading wireless operator has always been calling for heavy-handed regulation against WhatsApp because it considers WhatsApp and other over-the-top services are getting a free ride," said Ronald Gruia, director of emerging telecoms at Frost & Sullivan.

The company's stance "lines up with the position of the government, which wants more regulation for its own political interest," Gruia told the E-Commerce Times.

"Its approval rating is about 10 percent, and it's increasingly faced with scrutiny over various scandals, and a lot of the mobilization that's been happening against it has occurred over social media, which it can't control," he said. "TV and radio it can control."

Anatel, Brazil's equivalent of the United States Federal Communications Commission, "says operators around the world are dealing with messaging apps, so Brazilian carriers must deal with it," Gruia continued.

Oi, Brazil's "third or fourth largest telco," takes the same position as Anatel, he noted.

On the other hand, the ban on WhatsApp could have been merely an attempt by the judge to gain publicity, because "the judge probably knew the ruling would be struck down," Gruia commented.

Você Não Passará!

Given the climate of terrorism and the widespread unrest in the world, other governments, including the U.S. government, are taking the same position as Brazil's, suggested Rob Enderle, principal analyst at the Enderle Group.

"It's a shortcut to evidence, and one thing that's true of pretty much everyone in any industry is that we all like shortcuts," he told the E-Commerce Times.

However, Brazil's social media might remain free for a while yet.

"There won't necessarily be a clampdown, just more heavy-handed censorship," Gruia said. "It's a non-starter, and the government has bigger fish to fry."

Richard Adhikari has written about high-tech for leading industry publications since the 1990s and wonders where it's all leading to. Will implanted RFID chips in humans be the Mark of the Beast? Will nanotech solve our coming food crisis? Does Sturgeon's Law still hold true? You can connect with Richard on Google+.

11:30 AM

A Brazilian judge on Thursday lifted the ban a different judge had imposed on WhatsApp hours earlier, according to reports. It did ...

Read more »
 
Google Analytics Alternative